Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23469205›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Comprehensive analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 germline mutation and tumor characterization: a portrait of early-onset breast cancer in Brazil.

Dirce Maria Carraro, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira, Bianca Cristina Garcia Lisboa, Eloisa Helena Ribeiro Olivieri, Ana Cristina Vitorino Krepischi, Alex Fiorini de Carvalho, Louise Danielle de Carvalho Mota, Renato David Puga, Maria do Socorro Maciel, Rodrigo Augusto Depieri Michelli and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Public neoantigens in breast cancer immunotherapy (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Medical guidelines for Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2019, version 1.1.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Dirce Maria CarraroLaboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, A.C. Camargo Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. dirce.carraro@cipe.accamargo.org.br
Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira
Bianca Cristina Garcia Lisboa
Eloisa Helena Ribeiro Olivieri
Ana Cristina Vitorino Krepischi
Alex Fiorini de Carvalho
Louise Danielle de Carvalho Mota
Renato David Puga
Maria do Socorro Maciel
Rodrigo Augusto Depieri Michelli
Eduardo Carneiro de Lyra
Stana Helena Giorgi Grosso
Fernando Augusto Soares
Maria Isabel Alves de Souza Waddington Achatz
Helena Brentani
Carlos Alberto Moreira-Filho
Maria Mitzi Brentani
AC Camargo Hospital · BRHospital São Paulo · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 genes have been identified as one of the most important disease-causing issues in young breast cancer patients worldwide. The specific defective biological processes that trigger germline mutation-associated and -negative tumors remain unclear. To delineate an initial portrait of Brazilian early-onset breast cancer, we performed an investigation combining both germline and tumor analysis. Germline screening of the BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 (c.1100delC) and TP53 genes was performed in 54 unrelated patients <35 y; their tumors were investigated with respect to transcriptional and genomic profiles as well as hormonal receptors and HER2 expression/amplification. Germline mutations were detected in 12 out of 54 patients (22%) [7 in BRCA1 (13%), 4 in BRCA2 (7%) and one in TP53 (2%) gene]. A cancer familial history was present in 31.4% of the unrelated patients, from them 43.7% were carriers for germline mutation (37.5% in BRCA1 and in 6.2% in the BRCA2 genes). Fifty percent of the unrelated patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors carried BRCA1 mutations, percentage increasing to 83% in cases with familial history of cancer. Over-representation of DNA damage-, cellular and cell cycle-related processes was detected in the up-regulated genes of BRCA1/2-associated tumors, whereas cell and embryo development-related processes were over-represented in the up-regulated genes of BRCA1/2-negative tumors, suggesting distinct mechanisms driving the tumorigenesis. An initial portrait of the early-onset breast cancer patients in Brazil was generated pointing out that hormone receptor-negative tumors and positive familial history are two major risk factors for detection of a BRCA1 germline mutation. Additionally, the data revealed molecular factors that potentially trigger the tumor development in young patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGerm-Line MutationAdultAge of OnsetBrazilBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA Mutational AnalysisErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansInheritance PatternsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID23469205
PMCPMC3586086
OpenAlexW1965036754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.