Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23468874›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

454 pyrosequencing analysis on faecal samples from a randomized DBPC trial of colicky infants treated with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938.

Stefan Roos, Johan Dicksved, Valentina Tarasco, Emanuela Locatelli, Fulvio Ricceri, Ulf Grandin, Francesco Savino

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00893711 (Lactobacillus Reuteri Versus Placebo in the Treatment and Prevention of Infantile Colic), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00893711 naunknown statusnot on this map

Lactobacillus Reuteri Versus Placebo in the Treatment and Prevention of Infantile Colic: a Clinical and Microbiological, Double-blind, Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita Sant'AnnaRan2008 to 2022Enrolled155ConditionsInfantile ColicArmsLactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938, Placebo, L.reuteri + Vit D, Vit D placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Probiotics in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The role of potential probiotic strainsFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Colonization of SupplementedFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan RoosDepartment of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan Dicksved
Valentina Tarasco
Emanuela Locatelli
Fulvio Ricceri
Ulf Grandin
Francesco Savino
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Turin · ITItalian institute for Genomic Medicine · ITOspedale Regina Margherita · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the global microbial composition, using large-scale DNA sequencing of 16 S rRNA genes, in faecal samples from colicky infants given L. reuteri DSM 17938 or placebo.

methodsTwenty-nine colicky infants (age 10-60 days) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either Lactobacillus reuteri (10(8) cfu) or a placebo once daily for 21 days. Responders were defined as subjects with a decrease of 50% in daily crying time at day 21 compared with the starting point. The microbiota of faecal samples from day 1 and 21 were analyzed using 454 pyrosequencing. The primers: Bakt_341F and Bakt_805R, complemented with 454 adapters and sample specific barcodes were used for PCR amplification of the 16 S rRNA genes. The structure of the data was explored by using permutational multivariate analysis of variance and effects of different variables were visualized with ordination analysis.

resultsThe infants' faecal microbiota were composed of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes as the four main phyla. The composition of the microbiota in infants with colic had very high inter-individual variability with Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios varying from 4000 to 0.025. On an individual basis, the microbiota was, however, relatively stable over time. Treatment with L. reuteri DSM 17938 did not change the global composition of the microbiota, but when comparing responders with non-responders the group responders had an increased relative abundance of the phyla Bacteroidetes and genus Bacteroides at day 21 compared with day 0. Furthermore, the phyla composition of the infants at day 21 could be divided into three enterotype groups, dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria, respectively.

conclusionL. reuteri DSM 17938 did not affect the global composition of the microbiota. However, the increase of Bacteroidetes in the responder infants indicated that a decrease in colicky symptoms was linked to changes of the microbiota.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00893711.

Indexed as

MetagenomeBacteriaColicFecesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLimosilactobacillus reuteriMale

Identifiers

PMID23468874
PMCPMC3585302
OpenAlexW2081754982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.