Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23468643›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Deleterious alleles in the human genome are on average younger than neutral alleles of the same frequency.

Adam Kiezun, Sara L Pulit, Laurent C Francioli, Freerk van Dijk, Morris Swertz, Dorret I Boomsma, Cornelia M van Duijn, P Eline Slagboom, G J B van Ommen, Cisca Wijmenga and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. High-impactScience advances · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Adam KiezunDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sara L Pulit
Laurent C Francioli
Freerk van Dijk
Morris Swertz
Dorret I Boomsma
Cornelia M van Duijn
P Eline Slagboom
G J B van Ommen
Cisca Wijmenga
Genome of the Netherlands Consortium
Paul I W de Bakker
Shamil R Sunyaev

Funding

New Methods and Enhanced Software for Predicting Functional SNPsR01GM078598 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SUNYAEV, SHAMIL · 2007 to 2017
$3.5M
Statistical Methods for the Design and Interpretation of Deep Resequencing StudieR01MH084676 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SUNYAEV, SHAMIL · 2008 to 2010
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078598NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM078598NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084676NIMH NIH HHS R01MH084676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale population sequencing studies provide a complete picture of human genetic variation within the studied populations. A key challenge is to identify, among the myriad alleles, those variants that have an effect on molecular function, phenotypes, and reproductive fitness. Most non-neutral variation consists of deleterious alleles segregating at low population frequency due to incessant mutation. To date, studies characterizing selection against deleterious alleles have been based on allele frequency (testing for a relative excess of rare alleles) or ratio of polymorphism to divergence (testing for a relative increase in the number of polymorphic alleles). Here, starting from Maruyama's theoretical prediction (Maruyama T (1974), Am J Hum Genet USA 6:669-673) that a (slightly) deleterious allele is, on average, younger than a neutral allele segregating at the same frequency, we devised an approach to characterize selection based on allelic age. Unlike existing methods, it compares sets of neutral and deleterious sequence variants at the same allele frequency. When applied to human sequence data from the Genome of the Netherlands Project, our approach distinguishes low-frequency coding non-synonymous variants from synonymous and non-coding variants at the same allele frequency and discriminates between sets of variants independently predicted to be benign or damaging for protein structure and function. The results confirm the abundance of slightly deleterious coding variation in humans.

Indexed as

AllelesGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationSelection, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGene FrequencyGenome, HumanHumansModels, TheoreticalSequence Deletion

Identifiers

PMID23468643
PMCPMC3585140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.