Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23468364›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.

Roger von Moos, Cora Sternberg, Jean-Jacques Body, Carsten Bokemeyer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pain and analgesic use associated with skeletal-related events in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors initiating treatment with a bone-targeted agent in 2011: a descriptive analysis using oncology clinic data in the US.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Roger von MoosMedical Oncology/Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, 7000, Chur, Switzerland. roger.vonmoos@ksgr.ch
Cora Sternberg
Jean-Jacques Body
Carsten Bokemeyer
Carlo Forlanini Hospital · ITKantonsspital Graubünden · CHUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone metastases occur frequently in patients with solid tumours such as those of the prostate, breast and lung, and are associated with an increased risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). This article reviews the personal, social and economic burdens of bone metastases and SREs, and approaches to treatment.

methodsPubMed searches were conducted using a broad range of search terms. Articles identified were refined by author review of abstracts. Additional material was identified by searching recent relevant congress abstracts.

resultsBone metastases often decrease quality of life, but quantitative data on the extent of this effect are limited. Data from the USA demonstrate a significant financial burden associated with bone metastases; similar trends are now being uncovered in Europe as the number of assessments of health economics and healthcare resource utilisation in the region increases. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid reduces the incidence of SREs compared with placebo. Recent phase 3 studies have shown that therapy with the RANK ligand inhibitor denosumab is superior to zoledronic acid for preventing or delaying SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours. Denosumab also has a comparable safety profile to bisphosphonates, with reduced risk of renal toxicity and acute phase reactions. Data from Europe suggest that denosumab is cost-effective for the prevention of SREs compared with zoledronic acid. Additionally, several new experimental bone-targeted agents show promise.

conclusionRecent progress may help to reshape evidence-based guidelines to improve patient care and reduce the economic burden of bone metastases.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessFemaleHumansMaleBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID23468364
OpenAlexW114545088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.