ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life and satisfaction with care in elderly patients.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Guideline
- Assessment of cognitive function after surgery for colorectal cancer-a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Serious Gaming for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Older Adults With Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Review
- Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Literary Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Review
- Should Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Be Offered to Elderly Patients to Treat Right-Sided Colon Cancer?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Improving disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment using novel bionic technologies.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- The Quality of Life of Patients with Surgically Treated Colorectal Cancer: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Prospective Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer: A 12-Month Cohort Observation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Predictors of Quality of Life Six Years after Curative Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Article
- Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2016Article
- Review
- Health related quality of life after oesophagectomy: elderly patients refer similar eating and swallowing difficulties than younger patients.BMC cancer · 2015Article
- Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2015Article
- Personalized surgical management of colorectal cancer in elderly population.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this multicentric prospective study was to evaluate postoperative HRQL and satisfaction with care after laparoscopic colonic resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients.
methodsA total of 116 patients were enrolled in this study: 33 patients older than age 70 years had laparoscopic colectomy, whereas 24 had open colectomy; 44 patients younger than age 70 years had laparoscopic colectomy and 15 of them had open colectomy. The patients answered to three questionnaires about generic (EORTC QLQ C30) and disease-specific quality of life (EORTC CR29) and about treatment satisfaction (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Nonparametric tests and forward stepwise multiple regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.
resultsOne month after surgery, global quality of life (QL2 item) was significantly impaired in elderly patients who had laparoscopic colectomy compared with younger patients who had the same operation (p = 0.003). Similarly, role function (RF), physical function (PF), emotional function (EF), cognitive function (CF), and social function (SF) were impaired in elderly patients who had laparoscopic colectomy compared with younger patients (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.013, p < 0.001, p = 0.01, respectively). Fatigue (FA), sleep disturbances (SL), appetite loss (AP), and dyspnea (DY) affected the quality of life of these patients more than younger patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.055, p = 0.051, and p = 0.003, respectively).
conclusionsElderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for cancer experience less postoperative local complications than elderly patients undergoing open colectomy. Nevertheless, in the first postoperative month, these patients experience a worse global quality of life than younger patients undergoing the same operation with impairment of all the functions and the presence of fatigue, sleep disturbances, appetite loss, and dyspnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23468328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.