Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23468090›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2014

Group-constrained sparse fMRI connectivity modeling for mild cognitive impairment identification.

Chong-Yaw Wee, Pew-Thian Yap, Daoqiang Zhang, Lihong Wang, Dinggang Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chong-Yaw WeeImage Display, Enhancement, and Analysis (IDEA) Laboratory, Biomedical Research Imaging Center (BRIC) and Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA, cywee2000@gmail.com.
Pew-Thian Yap
Daoqiang Zhang
Lihong Wang
Dinggang Shen
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USImaging Center · USNanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics · CN

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI RAJAN, KUMAR B. · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
Longitudinal Mapping of Human Brain Development in the First Years of LifeR01EB008374 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YAP, PEW-THIAN · 2009 to 2024
$5.1M
Development of Robust Brain Measurement Tools Informed by Ultrahigh Field 7T MRIR01EB006733 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YAP, PEW-THIAN · 2008 to 2020
$4.5M
Quantifying Brain Abnormality by Multimodality Neuroimage Analysis,R01AG041721 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, MINGXIA · 2012 to 2019
$3.0M
Fast, Robust Analysis of Large Population DataR01EB009634 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEN, DINGGANG · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
Neonatal Brain SegmentationRC1MH088520 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEN, DINGGANG · 2009 to 2010
$1000k
FMRI: Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment In Geriatric DepressionK23AG028982 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2008 to 2010
$627k
"MR Morphometrics and Cognitive Decline Rate in Large-Scale Aging Studies"K01AG030514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CARMICHAEL, OWEN T. · 2008 to 2012
$495k
NIA NIH HHS AG041721NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030514NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028982NIA NIH HHS K23-AG028982NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041721NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS EB006733NIBIB NIH HHS EB008374NIBIB NIH HHS EB009634NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006733NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008374NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009634NIMH NIH HHS MH088520NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH088520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergence of advanced network analysis techniques utilizing resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) has enabled a more comprehensive understanding of neurological disorders at a whole-brain level. However, inferring brain connectivity from R-fMRI is a challenging task, particularly when the ultimate goal is to achieve good control-patient classification performance, owing to perplexing noise effects, curse of dimensionality, and inter-subject variability. Incorporating sparsity into connectivity modeling may be a possible solution to partially remedy this problem since most biological networks are intrinsically sparse. Nevertheless, sparsity constraint, when applied at an individual level, will inevitably cause inter-subject variability and hence degrade classification performance. To this end, we formulate the R-fMRI time series of each region of interest (ROI) as a linear representation of time series of other ROIs to infer sparse connectivity networks that are topologically identical across individuals. This formulation allows simultaneous selection of a common set of ROIs across subjects so that their linear combination is best in estimating the time series of the considered ROI. Specifically, l 1-norm is imposed on each subject to filter out spurious or insignificant connections to produce sparse networks. A group-constraint is hence imposed via multi-task learning using a l 2-norm to encourage consistent non-zero connections across subjects. This group-constraint is crucial since the network topology is identical for all subjects while still preserving individual information via different connectivity values. We validated the proposed modeling in mild cognitive impairment identification and promising results achieved demonstrate its superiority in disease characterization, particularly greater sensitivity to early stage brain pathologies. The inferred group-constrained sparse network is found to be biologically plausible and is highly associated with the disease-associated anatomical anomalies. Furthermore, our proposed approach achieved similar classification performance when finer atlas was used to parcellate the brain space.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBrainBrain MappingCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysOxygenStatistics as TopicOxygen

Identifiers

PMID23468090
PMCPMC3710527
OpenAlexW2007369824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.