Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23468058›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

Mammographic breast density response to aromatase inhibition.

Celine M Vachon, Vera J Suman, Kathleen R Brandt, Matthew L Kosel, Aman U Buzdar, Janet E Olson, Fang-Fang Wu, Lynn M Flickinger, Giske Ursin, Catherine R Elliott and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Breast Cancer Population Attributable Risk Proportions Associated with Body Mass Index and Breast Density by Race/Ethnicity and Menopausal Status.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Longitudinal Changes in Volumetric Breast Density with Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Mammographic Density as a Biosensor of Tamoxifen Effectiveness in Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment of Breast Cancer: Opportunities and Implications.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Celine M VachonDepartment of Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA. vachon.celine@mayo.edu
Vera J Suman
Kathleen R Brandt
Matthew L Kosel
Aman U Buzdar
Janet E Olson
Fang-Fang Wu
Lynn M Flickinger
Giske Ursin
Catherine R Elliott
Lois Shepherd
Richard M Weinshilboum
Paul E Goss
James N Ingle
Massachusetts General Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USQueen's University · CAUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
PHARMACOGENETICS OF PHASE II DRUG METABOLIZING ENZYMESU01GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2000 to 2009
$15.7M
A Mayo Cohort Study of Mammographic Breast DensityR01CA097396 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VACHON, CELINE M · 2003 to 2007
$3.1M
Risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypesR01CA140286 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KERLIKOWSKE, KARLA M, VACHON, CELINE M · 2010 to 2014
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097396NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140286NCI NIH HHS R01 CA97396NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061388NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM61388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMammographic breast density (MBD) is decreased by tamoxifen, but the effect of aromatase inhibitors is less clear. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe enrolled early-stage postmenopausal patients with breast cancer initiating adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy and ascertained mammograms before and at an average 10 months of aromatase inhibitor therapy. We matched cases to healthy postmenopausal women (controls) from a large mammography screening cohort on age, baseline body mass index, baseline MBD, and interval between mammograms. We estimated change in MBD using a computer-assisted thresholding program (Cumulus) and compared differences between cases and matched controls.

resultsIn predominantly White women (96%), we found 14% of the 387 eligible cases had a MBD reduction of at least 5% after an average of 10 months of aromatase inhibitor therapy. MBD reductions were associated with higher baseline MBD, aromatase inhibitor use for more than 12 months, and prior postmenopausal hormone use. Comparing each case with her matched control, there was no evidence of an association of change in MBD with aromatase inhibitor therapy [median case-control difference among 369 pairs was -0.1% (10th and 90th percentile: -5.9%, 5.2%) P = 0.51]. Case-control differences were similar by type of aromatase inhibitor (P's 0.41 and 0.56); prior use of postmenopausal hormones (P = 0.85); baseline MBD (P = 0.55); and length of aromatase inhibitor therapy (P = 0.08).

conclusionsIn postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors, 14% of cases had a MBD reduction of more than 5%, but these decreases did not differ from matched controls. These data suggest that MBD is not a clinically useful biomarker for predicting the value of aromatase inhibitor therapy in White postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

MammographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostmenopauseWomen's HealthAromatase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23468058
PMCPMC3630282
OpenAlexW2142306777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.