Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23467776›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Development of immunochromatography-based methods for detection of leptospiral lipopolysaccharide antigen in urine.

Dian Widiyanti, Nobuo Koizumi, Takashi Fukui, Lisa T Muslich, Takaya Segawa, Sharon Y A M Villanueva, Mitsumasa Saito, Toshiyuki Masuzawa, Nina G Gloriani, Shin-ichi Yoshida

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nucleic acid and antigen detection tests for leptospirosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Laboratory Diagnosis of Leptospirosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Authors' response.The Indian journal of medical research · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Dian WidiyantiDepartment of Bacteriology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. dian@bact.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Nobuo Koizumi
Takashi Fukui
Lisa T Muslich
Takaya Segawa
Sharon Y A M Villanueva
Mitsumasa Saito
Toshiyuki Masuzawa
Nina G Gloriani
Shin-ichi Yoshida
Kyushu University · JPChiba Institute of Science · JPNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PHYarsi University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis is an infectious disease caused by the spirochete bacteria Leptospira spp. and is commonly found throughout the world. Diagnosis of leptospirosis performed by culture and microscopic agglutination tests is laborious and time-consuming. Therefore, we aimed to develop a novel immunochromatography (ICG)-based method for detecting Leptospira antigen in the urine of patients and animals. We used the 1H6 monoclonal antibody (MAb), which is specific to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that is common among Leptospira spp. The MAb was coupled to 40-nm-diameter colloidal gold, and the amounts of labeled antibody and immobilized antibody were 23 μg and 2 μg per test, respectively. Several strains of Leptospira and other bacterial species were used to evaluate the sensitivities and specificities of the assays we developed. The detection limit of the assays was 10(6) cells/ml when disrupted whole bacterial cells were used. The assays were Leptospira specific since they did not cross-react with non-Leptospira bacteria used in the study. Application of diagnostic assays was done on the urine samples of 46 Leptospira-infected hamsters, 44 patients with suspected leptospirosis, and 14 healthy individuals. Pretreatment of the urine samples by boiling and centrifugation (for ultrafiltration and concentration) eliminated nonspecific reactions that occurred in the assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the ICG-based lateral flow assay (LFA) were 89% and 87%, respectively, which were higher than those of the dipstick assay, which were 80% and 74%, respectively. In summary, this ICG-based LFA can be used as an alternative diagnostic assay for leptospirosis. Further development is still necessary to improve the assay.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialChromatography, AffinityCricetinaeGold ColloidHumansLeptospiraLeptospirosisLipopolysaccharidesSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialGold ColloidLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID23467776
PMCPMC3647744
OpenAlexW2127918571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.