ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2011
Health economic assessment for screening of gastric cancer in a high risk population in northeastern china.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Characteristics and implications of insurance-reimbursed inpatient care for gastric and oesophageal cancers in Anhui, China.International health · 2021Article
- Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer: A cost-utility analysis for countries with an intermediate gastric cancer risk.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- Influencing factors of inpatient expenditure pattern for cancer in China, 2015.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2017Article
- Cancer control programs in East Asia: evidence from the international literature.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2014Review
- A survey and evaluation of population-based screening for gastric cancer.Cancer biology & medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess economic cost-effects for the screening programs of gastric cancer in a high risk population in northeastern China.
methodsThe data were collected from November 2001 to December 2003. The multi-stage sampling to define the screening group and the control group was applied in this study. Two stage screening programs were used in the study. An epidemiological survey and serum PG test were carried out in the first stage. The endoscopy and pathological examination were performed in the second stage screening. Effectiveness was assessed by the increased quality adjusted life-year (QALY) because of reduced gastric cancer deaths in screening.
resultsA total of 27,970 participants (n=7,128 screening group, n=20,842 control group) were enrolled in the survey. Twenty nine gastric cancer cases were detected in the screening group with 20 cases in the early stage and 9 cases in the advanced stage, respectively. Eighty six gastric cancer cases were detected in the control group, all of whom were in the advanced stage and had died before the study finished. The screening and treatment of 29 cases cost $152,227 and $5,249 per each case, respectively. The costs were $459 to gain per QALY.
conclusionThe screening program of gastric cancer used in our study is an economic and society-beneficial measure to detect gastric cancer in high risk area. The methods fit China's present economic development level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.