ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Performance of the MagNA Pure 96 system for cytomegalovirus nucleic acid amplification testing in clinical samples.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 in the point-of-care using digital PCR-based Dr. PCR™ Di20K COVID-19 Detection Kit without viral RNA extraction.Genes & genomics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Three Automated Extraction Systems for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Clinical Respiratory Specimens.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multiplexing primer/probe sets for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by qRT-PCR.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020Article
- Validation of SARS-CoV-2 detection across multiple specimen types.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020Article
- Article
- Performance Evaluation of the Real-Q Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Quantification Kit Using Two Real-Time PCR Systems for Quantifying CMV DNA in Whole Blood.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report shows the performance of MagNA Pure 96 automated nucleic acid extraction for the quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in clinical samples by real-time PCR. The obtained results demonstrate that this workflow is characterized by high sensitivity and linearity and ensures reliable, reproducible clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.