ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2012
Review article: ventilator-associated pneumonia in major burns.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined therapy with nebulized and intravenous colistin for the treatment of multidrug resistance pneumonia in burn patients: experience from a third referral burn care center in Mexico City.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Face and Neck Burns on Respiratory Complications and Mortality.European burn journal · 2025Article
- Factors Predictive of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Trauma Patients.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Among Trauma Patients, Younger Men with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Have Worse Outcomes Compared to Older Men-An Exploratory Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Burn care in South Africa: a micro cosmos of Africa.Pediatric surgery international · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major burns victims are particularly susceptible to pneumonia, especially ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP remains a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality, despite improvements in intensive care and burns surgery in recent times. Length of ventilation, type and size of burn (especially inhalational burns) are related to the incidence of VAP. Other risk factors (number of re-intubations, theatre visits) are also important. Effective preventative strategies should be adhered to, and protocols should be implemented to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of VAP. Clinical criteria, radiology, and broncho-alveolar lavage should be used to determine the causative organism, and there should be a low threshold for the early initiation of empiric therapy, based on the prevailing resistance patterns in the unit. Major burns should be managed in centres where there is ready access to multidisciplinary resources and expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23467023PMC3575144W65373444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.