Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23466960›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2013

Rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease: an update on treatment issues.

Medha Barbhaiya, Daniel H Solomon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is preclinical autoimmunity benign?: The case of cardiovascular disease.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Medha BarbhaiyaDivision of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel H Solomon
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Patient Centered Outcomes Research in RheumatologyK24AR055989 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SOLOMON, DANIEL HAL · 2008 to 2017
$1.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR 055989NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR055989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines thresholds for treatment of traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and whether RA-specific treatment modulates cardiovascular risk. RECENT

findingsThere are substantial data demonstrating an increased CVD risk among patients with RA. Both traditional CVD risk factors and inflammation contribute to this risk. Recent epidemiologic studies strengthen the case that aggressive immunosuppression with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, is associated with a reduced risk of CVD events. However, to date, there are no randomized controlled trials published regarding the management of CVD in RA. SUMMARY: Epidemiologic evidence continues to accumulate regarding the relationship between the effects of traditional CVD risk factors and RA-specific treatments on cardiovascular outcomes in RA. The field needs randomized controlled trials to better guide management.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansMethotrexateRisk FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID23466960
PMCPMC4836607
OpenAlexW2331349753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.