Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23466706›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2013

Dissecting the pathways that destabilize mutant p53: the proteasome or autophagy?

Sujata Choudhury, Vamsi K Kolukula, Anju Preet, Chris Albanese, Maria Laura Avantaggiati

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Autophagy modulation in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. iScience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Anticancer Therapeutic Strategies Targeting p53 Aggregation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sujata ChoudhuryDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Vamsi K Kolukula
Anju Preet
Chris Albanese
Maria Laura Avantaggiati
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USVince Lombardi Cancer Clinic · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
TRAINING GRANT IN TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009686 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA Tate RIEGEL, DAVID J ROBBINS · 1996 to 2026
$10.8M
anti-tumor activity of deactylase inhibitorsR01CA102746 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI AVANTAGGIATI, MARIA L · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102746NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One fundamental feature of mutant forms of p53 consists in their accumulation at high levels in tumors. At least in the case of neomorphic p53 mutations, which acquire oncogenic activity, stabilization is a driving force for tumor progression. It is well documented that p53 mutants are resistant to proteasome-dependent degradation compared with wild-type p53, but the exact identity of the pathways that affect mutant p53 stability is still debated. We have recently shown that macroautophagy (autophagy) provides a route for p53 mutant degradation during restriction of glucose. Here we further show that in basal conditions of growth, inhibition of autophagy with chemical inhibitors or by downregulation of the essential autophagic genes ATG1/Ulk1, Beclin-1 or ATG5, results in p53 mutant stabilization. Conversely, overexpression of Beclin-1 or ATG1/Ulk1 leads to p53 mutant depletion. Furthermore, we found that in many cell lines, prolonged inhibition of the proteasome does not stabilize mutant p53 but leads to its autophagic-mediated degradation. Therefore, we conclude that autophagy is a key mechanism for regulating the stability of several p53 mutants. We discuss plausible mechanisms involved in this newly identified degradation pathway as well as the possible role played by autophagy during tumor evolution driven by mutant p53.

Indexed as

AutophagyApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsAutophagy-Related Protein-1 HomologAutophagy-Related Protein 5Beclin-1Cell LineDown-RegulationHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLeupeptinsMembrane ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMutationProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsATG5 protein, humanAutophagy-Related Protein-1 HomologAutophagy-Related Protein 5Beclin-1BECN1 protein, humanbenzyloxycarbonylleucyl-leucyl-leucine aldehydeIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLeupeptinsMembrane ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, Small InterferingTumor Suppressor Protein p53UbiquitinULK1 protein, humanautophagycancermutantmutationsp53proteasomeubiquitin tumor

Identifiers

PMID23466706
PMCPMC3646859
OpenAlexW2052077889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.