Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23465541›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2013

Genome organization and long-range regulation of gene expression by enhancers.

Andrea Smallwood, Bing Ren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea SmallwoodLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, United States.
Bing Ren

Funding

The San Diego Epigenome CenterU01ES017166 · NIEHS · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2008 to 2013
$16.3M
Center for Mammalian Regulatory GenomicsU54HG006997 · NHGRI · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2012 to 2016
$14.3M
TRAINING IN MOLECULAR &CELL BIOLOGY OF ALLERGYT32AI007469 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BROIDE, DAVID H · 1994 to 2024
$6.9M
Genome-wide map of active promoters in the mouse cellsR01HG003991 · NHGRI · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2008 to 2011
$2.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006997NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG006997NIAID NIH HHS 5 T32 AI007469NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007469NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES017166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well accepted that cell-type specific gene regulation is under the purview of enhancers. Great strides have been made recently to characterize and identify enhancers both genetically and epigenetically for multiple cell types and species, but efforts have just begun to link enhancers to their target promoters. Mapping these interactions and understanding how the 3D landscape of the genome constrains such interactions is fundamental to our understanding of mammalian gene regulation. Here, we review recent progress in mapping long-range regulatory interactions in mammalian genomes, focusing on transcriptional enhancers and chromatin organization principles.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGenomeAnimalsHumansMammalsPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23465541
PMCPMC4180870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.