Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23464343›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2013

PET∕CT imaging evidence of FUS-mediated (18)F-FDG uptake changes in rat brain.

Hyungmin Kim, Mi-Ae Park, Shuyan Wang, Alan Chiu, Krisztina Fischer, Seung-Schik Yoo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Targeting diffuse midline gliomas: The promise of focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyungmin KimDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Mi-Ae Park
Shuyan Wang
Alan Chiu
Krisztina Fischer
Seung-Schik Yoo
Harvard University · USUlsan National Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Image-Guided TherapyR25CA089017 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FENNESSY, FIONA · 2001 to 2017
$7.8M
Non-invasive Modulation of Brain Function by Focused UltrasoundR21NS074124 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI YOO, SEUNG-SCHIK · 2011 to 2012
$490k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA089017NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS074124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTranscranial focused ultrasound (FUS) delivers highly focused acoustic energy to a small region of the brain in a noninvasive manner. Recent studies have revealed that FUS, which is administered either in pulsed or continuous waves, can elicit or suppress neural tissue excitability. This neuromodulatory property of FUS has been demonstrated via direct motion detection, electrophysiological recordings, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), confocal imaging, and microdialysis sampling of neurotransmitters. This study presents new evidence of local increase in glucose metabolism induced by FUS to the rat brain using FDG (18-fludeoxyglucose) positron emission tomography (PET).

methodsSprague-Dawley rats underwent sonication to a unilateral hemispheric area of the brain prior to PET scan. The pulsed sonication (350 kHz, tone burst duration of 0.5 ms, pulse repetition frequency of 1 kHz, and duration of 300 ms) was applied in 2 s intervals for 40 min immediately after the FDG injection via tail vein. Subsequently, the PET was acquired in dynamic list-mode to image FDG activity for an hour, and reconstructed into a single volume representing standardized uptake value (SUV). The raw SUV as well as its asymmetry index (AI) were measured from five different volume-of-interests (VOIs) of the brain for both hemispheres, and compared between sonicated and unsonicated groups.

resultsStatistically significant hemispheric changes in SUV were observed only at the center of sonication focus within the FUS group [paired t-test; t(7) = 3.57, p < 0.05]. There were no significant hemispheric differences in SUV within the control group in any of the VOIs. A statistically significant elevation in AI (t-test; t(7) = 3.40, p < 0.05) was observed at the center of sonication focus (7.9 ± 2.5%, the deviations are in standard error) among the FUS group when compared to the control group (-0.8 ± 1.2%).

conclusionsSpatially distinct increases in the glucose metabolic activity in the rat brain is present only at the center of sonication focus, suggesting localized functional neuromodulation mediated by the sonication.

Indexed as

EchoencephalographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsBiological TransportBrainGlucoseMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySonicationFluorodeoxyglucose F18Glucose

Identifiers

PMID23464343
PMCPMC3585755
OpenAlexW2087718224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.