Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23464140›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2013

On the statistical equivalence of restrained-ensemble simulations with the maximum entropy method.

Benoît Roux, Jonathan Weare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI-Physics-Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Energy landscape analysis of the development of the chromosome structure across the cell cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Integrative spatiotemporal modeling of biomolecular processes: Application to the assembly of the nuclear pore complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benoît RouxDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Gordon Center for Integrative Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. roux@uchicago.edu
Jonathan Weare

Funding

Synthetic Antigen Binder CoreU54GM087519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NAKAMOTO, ROBERT K. · 2010 to 2017
$31.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM087519NIGMS NIH HHS U54-GM087519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An issue of general interest in computer simulations is to incorporate information from experiments into a structural model. An important caveat in pursuing this goal is to avoid corrupting the resulting model with spurious and arbitrary biases. While the problem of biasing thermodynamic ensembles can be formulated rigorously using the maximum entropy method introduced by Jaynes, the approach can be cumbersome in practical applications with the need to determine multiple unknown coefficients iteratively. A popular alternative strategy to incorporate the information from experiments is to rely on restrained-ensemble molecular dynamics simulations. However, the fundamental validity of this computational strategy remains in question. Here, it is demonstrated that the statistical distribution produced by restrained-ensemble simulations is formally consistent with the maximum entropy method of Jaynes. This clarifies the underlying conditions under which restrained-ensemble simulations will yield results that are consistent with the maximum entropy method.

Indexed as

EntropyMolecular Dynamics SimulationStatistics as TopicProbability

Identifiers

PMID23464140
PMCPMC3598863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.