Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23463313›Full record

ReviewNature structural & molecular biology2013

Epigenetic programming and reprogramming during development.

Irene Cantone, Amanda G Fisher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 203 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Maternal O-GlcNAc Transferase Is Required for the Asymmetry of Epigenetic Modifications in Mouse Zygotes.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transgenerational Impact of Environmental Change.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Epigenetic Echoes: Bridging Nature, Nurture, and Healing Across Generations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Lactylation and human disease.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The Molecular Biology of Placental Transport of Calcium to the Human Foetus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irene CantoneLymphocyte Development Group, Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Amanda G Fisher

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120027516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell identity is determined by specific gene expression patterns that are conveyed by interactions between transcription factors and DNA in the context of chromatin. In development, epigenetic modifiers are thought to stabilize gene expression and ensure that patterns of DNA methylation and histone modification are reinstated in cells as they divide. Global erasure of epigenetic marks occurs naturally at two stages in the mammalian life cycle, but it can also be artificially engineered using a variety of reprogramming strategies. Here we review some of the recent advances in understanding how epigenetic remodeling contributes to conversion of cell fate in vivo and in vitro. We summarize current models of epigenetic erasure and discuss the various enzymes and mechanisms that may operate in cellular reprogramming.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBlastocystCell DifferentiationChromatinGerm CellsHistonesHumansMammalsTranscription FactorsChromatinHistonesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23463313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.