Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23463284›Full record

SynthesisClinical orthopaedics and related research2013

Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization in orthopaedic surgery and reduction of surgical site infections.

Antonia F Chen, Charles B Wessel, Nalini Rao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A tool based on objective data to identify patients at elevated risk of hospital-onsetAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Staphylococcus aureus colonization as a risk factor for acute radiation dermatitis].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite scaffolds fabricated fromInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Fracture-related infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. High Levels of Methicillin-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonia F ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
Charles B Wessel
Nalini Rao
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus aureus is the most common organism responsible for orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSIs). Patients who are carriers for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have a higher likelihood of having invasive S. aureus infections. Although some have advocated screening for S. aureus and decolonizing it is unclear whether these efforts reduce SSIs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to determine (1) whether S. aureus screening and decolonization reduce SSIs in orthopaedic patients and (2) if implementing this protocol is cost-effective.

methodsStudies for this systematic review were identified by searching PubMed, which includes MEDLINE (1946-present), EMBASE.com (1974-present), and the Cochrane Library's (John Wiley & Sons) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTAD), and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED). Comprehensive literature searches were developed using EMTREE, MeSH, and keywords for each of the search concepts of decolonization, MRSA, and orthopedics/orthopedic surgery. Studies published before 1968 were excluded. We analyzed 19 studies examining the ability of the decolonization protocol to reduce SSIs and 10 studies detailing the cost-effectiveness of S. aureus screening and decolonization.

resultsAll 19 studies showed a reduction in SSIs or wound complications by instituting a S. aureus screening and decolonization protocol in elective orthopaedic (total joints, spine, and sports) and trauma patients. The S. aureus screening and decolonization protocol also saved costs in orthopaedic patients when comparing the costs of screening and decolonization with the reduction of SSIs.

conclusionsPreoperative screening and decolonization of S. aureus in orthopaedic patients is a cost-effective means to reduce SSIs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAnti-Infective AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsCross InfectionHospital CostsHumansInfection ControlMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusOrthopedic ProceduresProgram EvaluationStaphylococcal InfectionsSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID23463284
PMCPMC3676622
OpenAlexW2048444495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.