Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23463157›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2013

[We cannot care alone: volunteers in dementia care at Nürnberg General Hospital].

E Eggenberger, J Myllymäki, C Kolb, R Martschin, L C Bollheimer, C Sieber

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E EggenbergerMedizinische Klinik für Innere Medizin und Geriatrie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Prof.- Ernst-Nathan-Str. 1, 90419, Nürnberg, Deutschland. eva.eggenberger@aau.at
J Myllymäki
C Kolb
R Martschin
L C Bollheimer
C Sieber
Nuremberg Hospital · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with dementia have specific care needs especially in an acute care setting. Professionals in clinical routine have limited capacities in meeting the needs of dementia patients as far as communication, interaction and orientation are concerned.

aimsFor 2 years, the Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics at Nürnberg General Hospital has hosted volunteers in dementia care who accompany and visit people with dementia during their acute care stay. We present the organization of the volunteer training program, training content, and preliminary evaluation results.

methodsWe chose a mixed methods approach for research and evaluation. Baseline data, motivational profile of volunteers, paper and pencil data on attitudes, skills and knowledge before and after training were assessed.

resultsPreliminary results show a positive effect on attitudes, skills, and knowledge after volunteer training. Volunteers and professionals need continual support and education to enable volunteers to act as an integrative part of the acute geriatric care team.

conclusionThe admission to an acute care setting is often frightening and confusing for dementia patients. Trained volunteers have the potential to make the hospital stay more pleasant for people with dementia.

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalDelivery of Health CareDementiaGermanyHealth Services for the AgedHospitals, GeneralHospital Volunteers

Identifiers

PMID23463157
OpenAlexW154374405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.