Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23462720›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2013

BRCA1 expression and improved survival in ovarian cancer patients treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

J L Lesnock, K M Darcy, C Tian, J A Deloia, M M Thrall, C Zahn, D K Armstrong, M J Birrer, T C Krivak

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

J L LesnockMagee-Women's Hospital of UPMC, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA.
K M Darcy
C Tian
J A Deloia
M M Thrall
C Zahn
D K Armstrong
M J Birrer
T C Krivak
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USGeorgetown University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMagee-Womens Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA 27469NCI NIH HHS CA 37517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) is a tumour-suppressor gene associated with familial epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Reduced BRCA1 expression is associated with enhanced sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. We sought to examine the prognostic relevance of BRCA1 expression in EOC patients treated with intraperitoneal platinum/taxane.

methodsThe GOG-172 was a phase III, multi-institutional randomised trial of intravenous paclitaxel and cisplatin (IV therapy) vs intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal cisplatin plus paclitaxel (IP therapy) in patients with optimally resected stage III EOC. The BRCA1 expression was assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining blinded to clinical outcome in archival tumour specimens. Slides with 10% staining were defined as aberrant and >10% as normal. Correlations between BRCA1 expression and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

resultsOf the 393 patients, 189 tumours had aberrant expression, and 204 had normal BRCA1 expression. There was an interaction between BRCA1 expression and route of administration on OS (P=0.014) but not PFS (P=0.054). In tumours with normal BRCA1 expression, the median OS was 58 months for IP group vs 50 months for IV group (P=0.818). In tumours with aberrant BRCA1 expression, the median OS was 84 vs 47 months in the IP vs IV group, respectively (P=0.0002). Aberrant BRCA1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for better survival in women randomised to IP therapy (hazard ratio (HR)=0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.47-0.97, P=0.032). Similar survival was observed in the IV and IP patients with normal BRCA1 expression. Multivariate but not univariate modelling demonstrated that IV patients with aberrant vs normal BRCA1 expression had worse survival.

conclusionDecreased BRCA1 expression is associated with a 36-month survival improvement in patients with EOC treated with IP chemotherapy. Although these results merit validation in future studies, the results suggest that decreased BRCA1 expression predicts for improved response to cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy with cisplatin and paclitaxel.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBRCA1 ProteinCisplatinCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesInjections, IntraperitonealMiddle AgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanCisplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID23462720
PMCPMC3619264
OpenAlexW2085076399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.