SynthesisNutrients2013
Role of probiotics in short bowel syndrome in infants and children--a systematic review.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotics in pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Probiotics for people with hepatic encephalopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and dysbiosis in children with intestinal failure: A descriptive cohort study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2025Article
- Review
- Analysis of risk factors affecting psycho-behavioural development in children with short bowel syndrome.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG maintains gut microbiota stability and promotes intestinal adaptation via activated intestinal farnesoid X receptor signaling in short bowel syndrome.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Pediatric Chronic Intestinal Failure: Something Moving?Nutrients · 2024Review
- Article
- Perinatal Outcomes of Neonates with Complex and Simple Gastroschisis after Planned Preterm Delivery-A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of Total Parenteral Nutrition on Gut Microbiota in Pediatric Population Suffering Intestinal Disorders.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Surgical Treatment of Short Bowel Syndrome-The Past, the Present and the Future, a Descriptive Review of the Literature.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Infection Prevention and Management in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- The Roles of Lactobacillus Acidophilus and Pectin in Preventing Postoperative Sepsis and Intestinal Adaptation in a Rat Model of Short Bowel Syndrome.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Article
- Probiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Necrotizing Enterocolitis.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2021Review
- Nutritional and pharmacological strategy in children with short bowel syndrome.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Review
- Short bowel syndrome in infancy: recent advances and practical management.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- First Report of Congenital Short Bowel Syndrome in an Iranian Patient Caused by a Mutation in theJournal of pediatric genetics · 2019Article
- The bacterial communities of the small intestine and stool in children with short bowel syndrome.PloS one · 2019Article
- Para-probiotics for Preterm Neonates-The Next Frontier.Nutrients · 2018Review
- Current treatment paradigms in pediatric short bowel syndrome.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in children. Probiotics, due to their beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., improving gut barrier function, motility, facilitation of intestinal adaptation and decreasing pathogen load and inflammation) may have a therapeutic role in the management of SBS. To conduct a systematic review of the current evidence for the effects of probiotic supplementation in children with SBS, the standard Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews was used. The databases, Pubmed, Embase, ACTR, CENTRAL, and the international trial registry, and reference lists of articles were searched for randomised (RCT) or quasi-randomised controlled trials reporting on the use of probiotics in SBS. Our search revealed no RCTs on the use of probiotics in children with SBS. We found one small cross-over RCT (placebo controlled crossover clinical trial), one case control study and nine case reports on the use of probiotics in children with SBS. In the crossover RCT, there was no consistent effect on intestinal permeability (primary outcome) after supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LGG) in nine children with SBS. The case control study (four cases: four controls) reported a trend for increase in height and weight velocity and improvement in non-clinical outcomes, such as gut flora, lymphocyte count and serum prealbumin. Five of the nine case reports showed that children (n = 12) with SBS were benefited (e.g., cessation of diarrhoea, improved faecal flora, weight gain and weaning from parenteral nutrition) by probiotic supplementation. The remaining four reported on the adverse effects, such as Lactobacillus sepsis (n = 3) and d-lactic acidosis (n = 2). There is insufficient evidence on the effects of probiotics in children with SBS. The safety and efficacy of probiotic supplementation in this high-risk cohort needs to be evaluated in large definitive trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.