Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23462115›Full record

ArticlemBio2013

Evolutionary analysis points to divergent physiological roles of type 1 fimbriae in Salmonella and Escherichia coli.

Dagmara I Kisiela, Sujay Chattopadhyay, Veronika Tchesnokova, Sandip Paul, Scott J Weissman, Irena Medenica, Steven Clegg, Evgeni V Sokurenko

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhibition ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Everything You Always Wanted to Know AboutFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Adhesion ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dagmara I KisielaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sujay Chattopadhyay
Veronika Tchesnokova
Sandip Paul
Scott J Weissman
Irena Medenica
Steven Clegg
Evgeni V Sokurenko
University of Washington · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Pathoadaptive evolution of SalmonellaR01GM084318 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CLEGG, STEVEN, SOKURENKO, EVGENI VENIAMINOVIC · 2008 to 2011
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledSalmonella and Escherichia coli mannose-binding type 1 fimbriae exhibit highly similar receptor specificities, morphologies, and mechanisms of assembly but are nonorthologous in nature, i.e., not closely related evolutionarily. Their operons differ in chromosomal location, gene arrangement, and regulatory components. In the current study, we performed a comparative genetic and structural analysis of the major structural subunit, FimA, from Salmonella and E. coli and found that FimA pilins undergo diverse evolutionary adaptation in the different species. Whereas the E. coli fimA locus is characterized by high allelic diversity, frequent intragenic recombination, and horizontal movement, Salmonella fimA shows structural diversity that is more than 5-fold lower without strong evidence of gene shuffling or homologous recombination. In contrast to Salmonella FimA, the amino acid substitutions in the E. coli pilin heavily target the protein regions that are predicted to be exposed on the external surface of fimbriae. Altogether, our results suggest that E. coli, but not Salmonella, type 1 fimbriae display a high level of structural diversity consistent with a strong selection for antigenic variation under immune pressure. Thus, type 1 fimbriae in these closely related bacterial species appear to function in distinctly different physiological environments. IMPORTANCE: E. coli and Salmonella are enteric bacteria that are closely related from an evolutionary perspective. They are both notorious human pathogens, though with somewhat distinct ecologies and virulence mechanisms. Type 1 fimbriae are rod-shaped surface appendages found in most E. coli and Salmonella isolates. In both species, they mediate bacterial adhesion to mannose receptors on host cells and share essentially the same morphology and assembly mechanisms. Here we show that despite the strong resemblances in function and structure, they are exposed to very different natural selection environments. Sequence analysis indicates that E. coli, but not Salmonella, fimbriae are subjected to strong immune pressure, resulting in a high level of major fimbrial protein gene shuffling and interbacterial transfer. Thus, evolutionary analysis tools can provide evidence of divergent physiological roles of functionally similar traits in different bacterial species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliFimbriae, BacterialFimbriae ProteinsHumansMolecular Sequence DataRecombination, GeneticSalmonellaSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialFimbriae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23462115
PMCPMC3604780
OpenAlexW2105765213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.