Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23460537›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2013

Five-year results of a prospective case series of accelerated hypofractionated whole breast radiation with concomitant boost to the surgical bed after conserving surgery for early breast cancer.

Domenico Cante, Pierfrancesco Franco, Piera Sciacero, Giuseppe Girelli, Anna Maria Marra, Massimo Pasquino, Giuliana Russo, Valeria Casanova Borca, Guido Mondini, Ovidio Paino and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03320421 (Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Whole-breast Radiation and Concomitant Boost to the Surgical Bed After Breast Conserving Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03320421 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Whole-breast Radiation and Concomitant Boost to the Surgical Bed After Breast Conserving Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2017 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsRadiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in radiotherapy for early-stage invasive breast cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Domenico CanteRadiotherapy Department, Ivrea Community Hospital, ASL TO4, Ivrea, Italy.
Pierfrancesco Franco
Piera Sciacero
Giuseppe Girelli
Anna Maria Marra
Massimo Pasquino
Giuliana Russo
Valeria Casanova Borca
Guido Mondini
Ovidio Paino
Roberto Barmasse
Santi Tofani
Gianmauro Numico
Maria Rosa La Porta
Umberto Ricardi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accelerated hypofractionation (HF) using larger dose per fraction, delivered in fewer fractions over a shorter overall treatment time, is presently a consistent possibility for adjuvant whole breast radiation (WBRT) after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer (EBC). Between 2005 and 2008, we submitted 375 consecutive patients to accelerated hypofractionated WBRT after breast-conserving surgery for EBC. The basic course of radiation consisted of 45 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks to the whole breast (2.25 Gy daily) with an additional daily concomitant boost of 0.25 Gy up to 50 Gy to the surgical bed. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) were assessed. Late toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE v3.0; acute toxicity using the RTOG/EORTC toxicity scale. Cosmesis was assessed comparing treated and untreated breast. Quality of life (QoL) was determined using EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. With a median follow-up of 60 months (range 42-88), 5 years OS, CSS, DFS and LC were 97.6, 99.4, 96.6 and 100 %, respectively. Late skin and subcutaneous toxicity was generally mild, with few events > grade 2 observed. Cosmetic results were excellent in 75.7 % of patients, good in 20 % and fair in 4.3 %. QoL, assessed both through QLQ-C30/QLQ-BR23, was generally favorable, within the functioning and symptoms domains. Our study is another proof of principle that HF WBRT with a concurrent boost dose to the surgical cavity represents a safe and effective postoperative treatment modality with excellent local control and survival, consistent cosmetic results and mild toxicity.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, RadiationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.