Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23459995›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2013

A phase II single-arm study of irinotecan in combination with temozolomide (TEMIRI) in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma: a joint ITCC and SIOPE-brain tumour study.

Darren Hargrave, Birgit Geoerger, Didier Frappaz, Torsten Pietsch, Lyle Gesner, Laura Cisar, Aurora Breazna, Andrew Dorman, Ofelia Cruz-Martinez, Jose Luis Fuster and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Darren HargravePaediatric Oncology Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. darren.hargrave@nhs.net
Birgit Geoerger
Didier Frappaz
Torsten Pietsch
Lyle Gesner
Laura Cisar
Aurora Breazna
Andrew Dorman
Ofelia Cruz-Martinez
Jose Luis Fuster
Xavier Rialland
Céline Icher
Pierre Leblond
David Ashley
Giorgio Perilongo
Martin Elliott
Martin English
Niels Clausen
Jacques Grill
Pfizer (United States) · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRAarhus University Hospital · DKBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRDeakin University · AUGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBHôpital Pellegrin · FRHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESInstitut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRLeeds General Infirmary · GBSaint Barnabas Medical Center · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multicenter, two stage phase II study, investigated irinotecan plus temozolomide in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma. The primary endpoint was tumor response during a two-cycle treatment window, confirmed by external review committee. Patients received oral temozolomide 100 mg/(m(2) day) (days 1-5) and intravenous irinotecan 10 mg/(m(2) day) (days 1-5 and 8-12) for two 21-day cycles (three cycles for patients exhibiting objective tumor response). Standard treatment was then administered according to local investigator choice. In total 17 patients were enrolled and treated by local investigators. However, central pathology review found three patients did not have a diagnosis of high grade glioma and another four patients did not have evaluable disease according to independent central radiological review. The primary endpoint was based on the first ten evaluable patients as determined by the external review committee. Recruitment was stopped for futility after there were no complete or partial responses during the two-cycle treatment window in the first ten evaluable patients. Five patients had stable disease, and five progressed. Data for secondary endpoints including; time to tumor progression, time to treatment failure, and overall survival is reported. The safety profile of the treatment showed the combination was tolerable with two patients (11.8 %) having grade three nausea, and one (5.9 %) experiencing a grade four neutropenia, leading to permanent discontinuation from adjuvant treatment. Irinotecan plus temozolomide, although well tolerated did not improve outcome over historical controls in this setting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCamptothecinChildChild, PreschoolDacarbazineFemaleGliomaHumansIrinotecanMaleNeoplasm GradingTemozolomideTreatment OutcomeCamptothecinDacarbazineIrinotecanTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID23459995
OpenAlexW2092770330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.