ArticleJournal of Cancer2013
Colorectal cancer screening in an equal access healthcare system.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal cancer information avoidance is associated with screening adherence.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Colon Cancer Diagnosis Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Modalities and Analysis Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes in older adults: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Observational
- Racism and Cancer Screening among Low-Income, African American Women: A Multilevel, Longitudinal Analysis of 2-1-1 Texas Callers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- miR-217-5p induces apoptosis by directly targeting PRKCI, BAG3, ITGAV and MAPK1 in colorectal cancer cells.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2018Article
- Survival among Lung Cancer Patients in the U.S. Military Health System: A Comparison with the SEER Population.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018Article
- Distribution pattern of colorectal diseases based on 2300 total colonoscopies.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2017Article
- miR-217 regulates tumor growth and apoptosis by targeting the MAPK signaling pathway in colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Missed Opportunities for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Specific metabolic biomarkers as risk and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Racial disparities in healthy behaviors and cancer screening among breast cancer survivors and women without cancer: National Health Interview Survey 2005.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2014Article
- Association between travel distance and metastatic disease at diagnosis among patients with colon cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe military health system (MHS) a unique setting to analyze implementation programs as well as outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC). Here we look at the efficacy of different CRC screening methods, attributes and results within the MHS, and current barriers to increase compliance. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed and the Cochrane library. Key-word combinations included colorectal cancer screening, racial disparity, risk factors, colorectal cancer, screening modalities, and randomized control trials. Directed searches were also performed of embedded references.
resultsDespite screening guidelines from several national organizations, extensive barriers to widespread screening remain, especially for minority populations. These barriers are diverse, ranging from education and access problems to personal beliefs. Screening rates in MHS have been reported to be generally higher at 71% compared to national averages of 50-65%.
conclusionCRC screening can be highly effective at improving detection of both pre-malignant and early cancers. Improved patient education and directed efforts are needed to improve CRC screening both nationally and within the MHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.