Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23459617›Full record

ArticlePattern recognition2013

Automated Delineation of Lung Tumors from CT Images Using a Single Click Ensemble Segmentation Approach.

Yuhua Gu, Virendra Kumar, Lawrence O Hall, Dmitry B Goldgof, Ching-Yen Li, René Korn, Claus Bendtsen, Emmanuel Rios Velazquez, Andre Dekker, Hugo Aerts and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pattern recognition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating clinical and radiomic features for predicting lung cancer recurrence pre- and post-tumor resection.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The value of asphericity derived from T1-weighted MR in differentiating intraparenchymal ring-enhancing lesions-comparison of glioblastomas and brain abscesses.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yuhua GuDepartment of Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612. USA.
Virendra Kumar
Lawrence O Hall
Dmitry B Goldgof
Ching-Yen Li
René Korn
Claus Bendtsen
Emmanuel Rios Velazquez
Andre Dekker
Hugo Aerts
Philippe Lambin
Xiuli Li
Jie Tian
Robert A Gatenby
Robert J Gillies

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Radiomics of NSCLCU01CA143062 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GILLIES, ROBERT J., SCHABATH, MATTHEW B. · 2010 to 2020
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS U01 CA143062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A single click ensemble segmentation (SCES) approach based on an existing "Click&Grow" algorithm is presented. The SCES approach requires only one operator selected seed point as compared with multiple operator inputs, which are typically needed. This facilitates processing large numbers of cases. Evaluation on a set of 129 CT lung tumor images using a similarity index (SI) was done. The average SI is above 93% using 20 different start seeds, showing stability. The average SI for 2 different readers was

Indexed as

CTDelineationEnsemble SegmentationImage FeaturesLesionLung TumorRegion growing

Identifiers

PMID23459617
PMCPMC3580869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.