Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23459409›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2013

Evidence-based Guidelines for Precision Risk Stratification-Based Screening (PRSBS) for Colorectal Cancer: Lessons learned from the US Armed Forces: Consensus and Future Directions.

Itzhak Avital, Russell C Langan, Thomas A Summers, Scott R Steele, Scott A Waldman, Vadim Backman, Judy Yee, Aviram Nissan, Patrick Young, Craig Womeldorph and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Itzhak Avital1. Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond VA ; 2. Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD ; 3. United States Military Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD ; 4. INCORE, International Consortium of Research Excellence of the Theodor-Billroth-Academy, Munich, Germany.
Russell C Langan
Thomas A Summers
Scott R Steele
Scott A Waldman
Vadim Backman
Judy Yee
Aviram Nissan
Patrick Young
Craig Womeldorph
Paul Mancusco
Renee Mueller
Khristian Noto
Warren Grundfest
Anton J Bilchik
Mladjan Protic
Martin Daumer
John Eberhardt
Yan Gao Man
Björn Ldm Brücher
Alexander Stojadinovic

Funding

GUCY2C hormone signaling at the intersection of obesity and colorectal cancer(PQ1R01CA170533 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI WALDMAN, SCOTT A · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States (U.S.), with estimates of 143,460 new cases and 51,690 deaths for the year 2012. Numerous organizations have published guidelines for CRC screening; however, these numerical estimates of incidence and disease-specific mortality have remained stable from years prior. Technological, genetic profiling, molecular and surgical advances in our modern era should allow us to improve risk stratification of patients with CRC and identify those who may benefit from preventive measures, early aggressive treatment, alternative treatment strategies, and/or frequent surveillance for the early detection of disease recurrence. To better negotiate future economic constraints and enhance patient outcomes, ultimately, we propose to apply the principals of personalized and precise cancer care to risk-stratify patients for CRC screening (Precision Risk Stratification-Based Screening, PRSBS). We believe that genetic, molecular, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities impact oncological outcomes in general, those related to CRC, in particular. This document highlights evidence-based screening recommendations and risk stratification methods in response to our CRC working group private-public consensus meeting held in March 2012. Our aim was to address how we could improve CRC risk stratification-based screening, and to provide a vision for the future to achieving superior survival rates for patients diagnosed with CRC.

Indexed as

cancer screeningcoloncolorectal cancerconsensusevidence-based medicinerectalrisk identification

Identifiers

PMID23459409
PMCPMC3584831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.