ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2012
Secondary Complications in SCI Across the Continuum: Using Operations Research to Predict the Impact and Optimize Management Strategies.
Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A geospatial examination of specialist care accessibility and impact on health outcomes for patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury in New South Wales, Australia: a population record linkage study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Understanding Length of Stay after Spinal Cord Injury: Insights and Limitations from the Access to Care and Timing Project.Journal of neurotrauma · 2017Article
- Methodology of the Access to Care and Timing Simulation Model for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Care.Journal of neurotrauma · 2017Article
- Impact of Therapy on Recovery during Rehabilitation in Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of neurotrauma · 2017Article
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Registries: Improving Care across the SCI Care Continuum by Identifying Knowledge Gaps.Journal of neurotrauma · 2017Article
- What are the people's attitudes toward spinal cord injury victims (from common to elite).Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary complications following traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) have a tremendous impact on quality of life and health care costs. Although some complications result from the injury itself, many originate from the care provided; complications arising early in the tSCI journey can predispose an individual to recurrence later. To measure the total impact of secondary complications on patient outcomes and health care costs, all the stages of care, from first response to life in the community, must be spanned. Interventions to ameliorate secondary complications need to consider the effects on the whole system and not just individual phases of care; however, such an approach is not common in the literature. To measure the impact of complications as well as the effect of proposed interventions, a partnership between clinical researchers and operations research professionals was formed to develop a discrete-event simulation model of the entire continuum of tSCI care. In this article, we focus on the part of the model concerning common secondary complications (eg, pressure ulcers, pneumonia). We first describe early results from the model, discuss how the effects from the complications impact care throughout the tSCI continuum, and review assumptions of the model. The article concludes with a discussion as to the possible uses of the model, their strengths/limitations, and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.