Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23459122›Full record

ReviewSpinal cord2013

The Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI/WISCI II): nature, metric properties, use and misuse.

J F Ditunno, P L Ditunno, G Scivoletto, M Patrick, M Dijkers, H Barbeau, A S Burns, R J Marino, M Schmidt-Read

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spinal cord, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06137456 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

First Report of a New Exoskeleton in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: FreeGait®

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2022 to 2023Enrolled14ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Walking, DifficultyArmsExoskeletal robotic therapy for walking., Conventional exercise therapy
NCT07440459 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessing and Modeling the Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot Aided Neurorehabilitation of Walking

TypeobservationalSponsorBioRobotics Group - Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Spinal Cord Injury, Neurorehabilitation, Robot Assisted Gait Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J F DitunnoRegional Spinal Cord Injury Center of the Delaware Valley, Thomas Jefferson University/Magee Rehabilitation, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. John.Ditunno@jefferson.edu
P L Ditunno
G Scivoletto
M Patrick
M Dijkers
H Barbeau
A S Burns
R J Marino
M Schmidt-Read

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designLiterature review.

objectiveTo critically review all publications/internet sites that have described/used the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), as a measure of impairment of walking function after spinal cord injury (SCI), in order to identify its psychometric properties, clarify its nature, specify misuse and incorporate the findings in an updated guide.

methodA systematic literature search was done of Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and electronic sites using key words: WISCI or WISCI II, SCI, paraplegia/ tetraplegia/ quadriplegia and ambulation/gait/walking. Among 1235 citations retrieved, 154 relevant articles/sites were identified, classified and examined by the authors; recommendations were made based on findings. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The validity (face/concurrent/content/construct/convergent/criterion) and reliability of the WISCI II has been documented in clinical trials and clinical series, and considered adequate by systematic reviewers. In chronic SCI subjects, reliable determination of the maximum (as opposed to self-selected) WISCI II level requires more time and experience by the assessor. The correct use of WISCI II is clarified for testing acute/chronic phases of recovery after SCI, age of subjects, devices and settings. The WISCI II and walking speed measures may be performed simultaneously.

conclusionThe increased use of the WISCI II is attributed to its unique characteristics as a capacity measure of walking function and its strong metric properties. Appropriate use of the WISCI II was clarified and incorporated into a new guide for its use. Combining it with a walking speed measure needs further study.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexWalkingGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID23459122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.