Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23458883›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2013

Adult human gingival epithelial cells as a source for whole-tooth bioengineering.

A Angelova Volponi, M Kawasaki, P T Sharpe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Chemically Defined Culture for Tooth Reconstitution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Tooth Formation: Are the Hardest Tissues of Human Body Hard to Regenerate?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Tooth Bioengineering and Regenerative Dentistry.Journal of dental research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A Angelova VolponiDepartment of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, Dental Institute, King's College London, Tower Wing Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, UK.
M Kawasaki
P T Sharpe
Guy's Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901599Medical Research Council MR/J006742/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teeth develop from interactions between embryonic oral epithelium and neural-crest-derived mesenchyme. These cells can be separated into single-cell populations and recombined to form normal teeth, providing a basis for bioengineering new teeth if suitable, non-embryonic cell sources can be identified. We show here that cells can be isolated from adult human gingival tissue that can be expanded in vitro and, when combined with mouse embryonic tooth mesenchyme cells, form teeth. Teeth with developing roots can be produced from this cell combination following transplantation into renal capsules. These bioengineered teeth contain dentin and enamel with ameloblast-like cells and rests of Malassez of human origin.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCoculture TechniquesEpithelial CellsGingivaHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMice, SCIDOdontogenesisTissue EngineeringToothTooth Germ

Identifiers

PMID23458883
PMCPMC3706174
OpenAlexW2163292175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.