ArticleJournal of microscopy2013
Localizing and extracting filament distributions from microscopy images.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- SOAX: a software for quantification of 3D biopolymer networks.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
- Quantitative analysis of F-actin redistribution in astrocytoma cells treated with candidate pharmaceuticals.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2014Article
- 3D actin network centerline extraction with multiple active contours.Medical image analysis · 2014Article
- Extraction of Individual Filaments from 2D Confocal Microscopy Images of Flat Cells.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2014-06-23Concerns/Issues about Image · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Copyright Claims · Investigation by Company/Institution · Objections by Third Party · Retract and Replace · · Article with same title and 2 of the same authors (S Basu and GK Rohde) was later published in vol. 258, no. 1 (2015);
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detailed quantitative measurements of biological filament networks represent a crucial step in understanding architecture and structure of cells and tissues, which in turn explain important biological events such as wound healing and cancer metastases. Confocal microscope images of biological specimens marked for different structural proteins constitute an important source for observing and measuring meaningful parameters of biological networks. Unfortunately, current efforts at quantitative estimation of architecture and orientation of biological filament networks from microscopy images are predominantly limited to visual estimation and indirect experimental inference. Here we describe a new method for localizing and extracting filament distributions from 2D confocal microscopy images. The method combines a filter-based detection of pixels likely to contain a filament with a constrained reverse diffusion-based approach for localizing the filaments centrelines. We show with qualitative and quantitative experiments, using both simulated and real data, that the new method can provide more accurate centreline estimates of filament in comparison to other approaches currently available. In addition, we show the algorithm is more robust with respect to variations in the initial filter-based filament detection step often used. We demonstrate the application of the method in extracting quantitative parameters from an experiment that seeks to quantify the effects of carbon nanotubes on actin cytoskeleton in live HeLa cells. We show that their presence can disrupt the overall actin cytoskeletal organization in such cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.