Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23458407›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2013

Distinct requirements within the Msh3 nucleotide binding pocket for mismatch and double-strand break repair.

Charanya Kumar, Gregory M Williams, Brett Havens, Michelle K Dinicola, Jennifer A Surtees

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Coordinated roles of SLX4 and MutSβ in DNA repair and the maintenance of genome stability.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charanya KumarDepartment of Biochemistry, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Gregory M WilliamsDepartment of Biochemistry, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Brett HavensDepartment of Biochemistry, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Michelle K DinicolaDepartment of Biochemistry, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Jennifer A SurteesDepartment of Biochemistry, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: jsurtees@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Roles for Mismatch Repair Proteins in Maintaining Genome StabilityR01GM087459 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SURTEES, JENNIFER ANNE · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM087459NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, repair of insertion/deletion loops is carried out by Msh2-Msh3-mediated mismatch repair (MMR). Msh2-Msh3 is also required for 3' non-homologous tail removal (3' NHTR) in double-strand break repair. In both pathways, Msh2-Msh3 binds double-strand/single-strand junctions and initiates repair in an ATP-dependent manner. However, the kinetics of the two processes appear different; MMR is likely rapid in order to coordinate with the replication fork, whereas 3' NHTR has been shown to be a slower process. To understand the molecular requirements in both repair pathways, we performed an in vivo analysis of well-conserved residues in Msh3 that are hypothesized to be required for MMR and/or 3' NHTR. These residues are predicted to be involved in either communication between the DNA-binding and ATPase domains within the complex or nucleotide binding and/or exchange within Msh2-Msh3. We identified a set of aromatic residues within the FLY motif of the predicted Msh3 nucleotide binding pocket that are essential for Msh2-Msh3-mediated MMR but are largely dispensable for 3' NHTR. In contrast, mutations in other regions gave similar phenotypes in both assays. Based on these results, we suggest that the two pathways have distinct requirements with respect to the position of the bound ATP within Msh3. We propose that the differences are related, at least in part, to the kinetics of each pathway. Proper binding and positioning of ATP is required to induce rapid conformational changes at the replication fork, but is less important when more time is available for repair, as in 3' NHTR.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAdenosine TriphosphateAmino Acid SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Mutational AnalysisKineticsModels, BiologicalModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutant ProteinsMutS Homolog 3 ProteinProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphateDNA-Binding ProteinsMSH3 protein, S cerevisiaeMutant ProteinsMutS Homolog 3 ProteinSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23458407
PMCPMC3657845
OpenAlexW2049577751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.