ArticleCellular reprogramming2013
Identifying candidate oocyte reprogramming factors using cross-species global transcriptional analysis.
Article in Cellular reprogramming, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- ING5: multifaceted roles beyond tumor suppression in cellular physiology and disease.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Review
- The Oocyte-Specific Linker Histone H1FOO Is Not Essential for Mouse Oogenesis and Fertility.Cells · 2022Article
- Molecular mechanisms of inhibitor of growth (ING) family members in health and malignancy.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- Distinct role of histone chaperone Asf1a and Asf1b during fertilization and pre-implantation embryonic development in mice.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021Article
- Mild dyserythropoiesis and β-like globin gene expression imbalance due to the loss of histone chaperone ASF1B.Human genomics · 2020Article
- Analysis of Menstrual Blood Stromal Cells Reveals SOX15 Triggers Oocyte-Based Human Cell Reprogramming.iScience · 2020Article
- Biological Functions of the ING Proteins.Cancers · 2019Review
- Genome-Scale CRISPRa Screen Identifies Novel Factors for Cellular Reprogramming.Stem cell reports · 2019Article
- Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly in the Passage of Epigenetic Information and Cell Identity.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2018Review
- The roles of Jumonji-type oxygenases in human disease.Epigenomics · 2014Review
- Maintenance of multipotency in human dermal fibroblasts treated with Xenopus laevis egg extract requires exogenous fibroblast growth factor-2.Cellular reprogramming · 2014Article
- Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer: advancements and problems.Cellular reprogramming · 2013Review
- Article
- Single-cell profiling of transcriptomic changes duringReproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is mounting evidence to suggest that the epigenetic reprogramming capacity of the oocyte is superior to that of the current factor-based reprogramming approaches and that some factor-reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) retain a degree of epigenetic memory that can influence differentiation capacity and may be linked to the observed expression of immunogenicity genes in iPSC derivatives. One hypothesis for this differential reprogramming capacity is the "chromatin loosening/enhanced reprogramming" concept, as previously described by John Gurdon and Ian Wilmut, as well as others, which postulates that the oocyte possesses factors that loosen the somatic cell chromatin structure, providing the epigenetic and transcriptional regulatory factors more ready access to repressed genes and thereby significantly increasing epigenetic reprogramming. However, to empirically test this hypothesis a list of candidate oocyte reprogramming factors (CORFs) must be ascertained that are significantly expressed in metaphase II oocytes. Previous studies have focused on intraspecies or cross-species transcriptional analysis of up to two different species of oocytes. In this study, we have identified eight CORFs (ARID2, ASF1A, ASF1B, DPPA3, ING3, MSL3, H1FOO, and KDM6B) based on unbiased global transcriptional analysis of oocytes from three different species (human, rhesus monkey, and mouse) that both demonstrate significant (p<0.05, FC>3) expression in oocytes of all three species and have well-established roles in loosening/opening up chromatin structure. We also identified an additional 15 CORFs that fit within our proposed "chromatin opening/fate transformative" (COFT) model. These CORFs may be able to augment Shinya Yamanaka's previously identified reprogramming factors (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and cMYC) and potentially facilitate the removal of epigenetic memory in iPSCs and/or reduce the expression of immunogenicity genes in iPSC derivatives, and may have applications in future personalized pluripotent stem cell based therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.