Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23458095›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2013

Automatic feature-based grouping during multiple object tracking.

Gennady Erlikhman, Brian P Keane, Everett Mettler, Todd S Horowitz, Philip J Kellman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gennady ErlikhmanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.ORCID 0000-0002-9594-2660
Brian P KeaneRutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University.
Everett MettlerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Todd S HorowitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Philip J KellmanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Funding

Spatial frequency contributions to contour integration deficits in schizophreniaF32MH094102 · NIMH · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI KEANE, BRIAN PATRICK · 2011 to 2014
$163k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH094102NIMH NIH HHS F32MH094102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contour interpolation automatically binds targets with distractors to impair multiple object tracking (Keane, Mettler, Tsoi, & Kellman, 2011). Is interpolation special in this regard or can other features produce the same effect? To address this question, we examined the influence of eight features on tracking: color, contrast polarity, orientation, size, shape, depth, interpolation, and a combination (shape, color, size). In each case, subjects tracked 4 of 8 objects that began as undifferentiated shapes, changed features as motion began (to enable grouping), and returned to their undifferentiated states before halting. We found that intertarget grouping improved performance for all feature types except orientation and interpolation (Experiment 1 and Experiment 2). Most importantly, target-distractor grouping impaired performance for color, size, shape, combination, and interpolation. The impairments were, at times, large (>15% decrement in accuracy) and occurred relative to a homogeneous condition in which all objects had the same features at each moment of a trial (Experiment 2), and relative to a "diversity" condition in which targets and distractors had different features at each moment (Experiment 3). We conclude that feature-based grouping occurs for a variety of features besides interpolation, even when irrelevant to task instructions and contrary to the task demands, suggesting that interpolation is not unique in promoting automatic grouping in tracking tasks. Our results also imply that various kinds of features are encoded automatically and in parallel during tracking.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionColor PerceptionContrast SensitivityDepth PerceptionHumansMotion PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceSize PerceptionSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23458095
PMCPMC3901520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.