Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23457662›Full record

ReviewWorm2012

Integrated control of protein degradation in C. elegans muscle.

Susann Lehmann, Freya Shephard, Lewis A Jacobson, Nathaniel J Szewczyk

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Worm, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. SERCA Silencing Alleviates AßInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Susann LehmannMedical Research Council/Arthritis Research UK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research; University of Nottingham; Royal Derby Hospital; Derby, UK.
Freya Shephard
Lewis A Jacobson
Nathaniel J Szewczyk
Royal Derby Hospital · GBUniversity of Derby · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Gene Networks Regulating Muscle Protein DegradationR01AR054342 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM · PI SZEWCZYK, NATHANIEL J. · 2007 to 2010
$902k
Medical Research Council G0801271NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein degradation is a fundamental cellular process, the genomic control of which is incompletely understood. The advent of transgene-coded reporter proteins has enabled the development of C. elegans into a model for studying this problem. The regulation of muscle protein degradation is surprisingly complex, integrating multiple signals from hypodermis, intestine, neurons and muscle itself. Within the muscle, degradation is executed by separately regulated autophagy-lysosomal, ubiquitin-proteasome and calpain-mediated systems. The signal-transduction mechanisms, in some instances, involve modules previously identified for their roles in developmental processes, repurposed in terminally differentiated muscle to regulate the activities of pre-formed proteins. Here we review the genes, and mechanisms, which appear to coordinately control protein degradation within C. elegans muscle. We also consider these mechanisms in the context of development, physiology, pathophysiology and disease models.

Identifiers

PMID23457662
PMCPMC3583358
OpenAlexW2050956010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.