Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23457581›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Interplay of protein and DNA structure revealed in simulations of the lac operon.

Luke Czapla, Michael A Grosner, David Swigon, Wilma K Olson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Modulation of DNA loop lifetimes by the free energy of loop formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  17. DNA topology confers sequence specificity to nonspecific architectural proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  18. What controls DNA looping?International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luke CzaplaDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.
Michael A Grosner
David Swigon
Wilma K Olson
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

THEORETICFAL ASPECTS OF DNA SUPERCOILINGR01GM034809 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI OLSON, WILMA K · 1985 to 2019
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS 2 R01 GM034809 25NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The E. coli Lac repressor is the classic textbook example of a protein that attaches to widely spaced sites along a genome and forces the intervening DNA into a loop. The short loops implicated in the regulation of the lac operon suggest the involvement of factors other than DNA and repressor in gene control. The molecular simulations presented here examine two likely structural contributions to the in-vivo looping of bacterial DNA: the distortions of the double helix introduced upon association of the highly abundant, nonspecific nucleoid protein HU and the large-scale deformations of the repressor detected in low-resolution experiments. The computations take account of the three-dimensional arrangements of nucleotides and amino acids found in crystal structures of DNA with the two proteins, the natural rest state and deformational properties of protein-free DNA, and the constraints on looping imposed by the conformation of the repressor and the orientation of bound DNA. The predicted looping propensities capture the complex, chain-length-dependent variation in repression efficacy extracted from gene expression studies and in vitro experiments and reveal unexpected chain-length-dependent variations in the uptake of HU, the deformation of repressor, and the folding of DNA. Both the opening of repressor and the presence of HU, at levels approximating those found in vivo, enhance the probability of loop formation. HU affects the global organization of the repressor and the opening of repressor influences the levels of HU binding to DNA. The length of the loop determines whether the DNA adopts antiparallel or parallel orientations on the repressor, whether the repressor is opened or closed, and how many HU molecules bind to the loop. The collective behavior of proteins and DNA is greater than the sum of the parts and hints of ways in which multiple proteins may coordinate the packaging and processing of genetic information.

Indexed as

Lac OperonModels, MolecularMonte Carlo MethodDNA, BacterialLac RepressorsNucleic Acid ConformationProtein ConformationDNA, BacterialLac Repressors

Identifiers

PMID23457581
PMCPMC3572996
OpenAlexW2068126220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.