Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23457578›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Predicting chemical toxicity effects based on chemical-chemical interactions.

Lei Chen, Jing Lu, Jian Zhang, Kai-Rui Feng, Ming-Yue Zheng, Yu-Dong Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification of Chemical Toxicity Using Ontology Information of Chemicals.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integration of bioinformatics to biodegradation.Biological procedures online · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lei ChenCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Jing Lu
Jian Zhang
Kai-Rui Feng
Ming-Yue Zheng
Yu-Dong Cai

Funding

Barriers to Alcohol, Drug and PTSD Treatment for Returning National GuardR01AA020308 · NIAAA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI AMES, GENEVIEVE MARIE, MOORE, ROLAND S · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicity is a major contributor to high attrition rates of new chemical entities in drug discoveries. In this study, an order-classifier was built to predict a series of toxic effects based on data concerning chemical-chemical interactions under the assumption that interactive compounds are more likely to share similar toxicity profiles. According to their interaction confidence scores, the order from the most likely toxicity to the least was obtained for each compound. Ten test groups, each of them containing one training dataset and one test dataset, were constructed from a benchmark dataset consisting of 17,233 compounds. By a Jackknife test on each of these test groups, the 1(st) order prediction accuracies of the training dataset and the test dataset were all approximately 79.50%, substantially higher than the rate of 25.43% achieved by random guesses. Encouraged by the promising results, we expect that our method will become a useful tool in screening out drugs with high toxicity.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsToxicologyDrug DiscoveryEndpoint DeterminationInformaticsStructure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID23457578
PMCPMC3574107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.