ArticleBMJ open2013
The association of patient characteristics and surgical variables on symptoms of pain and function over 5 years following primary hip-replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07147530 (Study to Verify Effectiveness and Safety of the Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device on Gait Ability in Patients With Hip Joint Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study to Verify Effectiveness and Safety of the Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device on Gait Ability in Patients With Hip Joint Diseases: Investigator Initiated, Single Center, Single Group Clinical Trial
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- The functional and psychological impact of delayed hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 89,996 patients.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Acupuncture for perioperative care of total hip arthroplasty: A systemic review of controlled trials and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Impact of comorbid conditions on outcomes of hip and knee replacement surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Predictors of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Pooled it
- [Personality and comorbidity: are there "difficult patients" in hip arthroplasty?].Der Orthopade · 2015Pooled it
- Clinical and cost effectiveness of single stage compared with two stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM): pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- Impact of preoperative mental health status on functional outcome 1 year after total hip arthroplastyCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2019Trial
- Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for patient-reported pain and function after primary total knee replacement surgery.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Effect of Kinesiophobia and Social Support on Quality of Life After Total Hip Arthoplasty.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Associated with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Total Hip Replacement Surgery: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Defining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for 12-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty; Toward Improving Threshold Accuracy.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Trendelenburg gait after total hip arthroplasty due to reduced muscle contraction of the hip abductors and extensors.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2024Article
- Early perioperative quality of recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative cohort study.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Risk factors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Review
- Comparison of Exeter stem offset size for total hip arthroplasty between males and females: A retrospective series of 780 hips.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- Is rationing of total hip arthroplasty justified? Working to optimize patient accessibility to surgery using long-term patient-reported outcome data.Bone & joint open · 2022Article
- Effects of Comorbidities on Pain and Function After Total Hip Arthroplasty.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Total Hip Replacement for Osteoarthritis-Evidence-Based and Patient-Oriented Indications.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo identify patient characteristics and surgical factors associated with patient-reported outcomes over 5 years following primary total hip replacement (THR).
designProspective cohort study.
settingSeven hospitals across England and Scotland.
participants1431 primary hip replacements for osteoarthritis.
main outcome measuresThe Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was collected preoperatively and each year up to 5 years postoperatively. Repeated measures such as linear regression modelling are used to identify patient and surgical predictors of outcome and describe trends over time.
resultsThe majority of patients demonstrated substantial improvement in pain/function in the first year after surgery-between 1 and 5 years follow-up, there was neither further improvement nor decline. The strongest determinant of attained postoperative OHS was the preoperative OHS-those with worse preoperative pain/function had worse postoperative pain/function. Other predictors with small but significant effects included: femoral component offset-women with an offset of 44 or more had better outcomes; age-compared to those aged 50-60, younger (age <50) and older patients (age >60) had worse outcome, increasing body mass index (BMI), more coexisting diseases and worse Short Form 36 mental health (MH) was related to worse postoperative pain/function. Assessment of change in OHS between preoperative and postoperative assessments revealed that patients achieved substantial and clinically relevant symptomatic improvement (change), regardless of variation in these patient and surgical factors.
conclusionsPatients received substantial benefit from surgery, regardless of their preoperative assessments and surgical characteristics (baseline pain/function, age, BMI, comorbidities, MH and femoral component offset). Further research is needed to identify other factors that can improve our ability to identify patients at risk of poor outcomes from THR surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.