Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23457261›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2013

Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in eukaryotes.

Julian E Sale

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic Assemblies in Genome Maintenance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Translesion Synthesis DNA Polymerase Gene Expression Is Impacted by Age and IGF-1 in Epidermal Human Skin.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. ISGylation: is our genome yearning for such a modification?Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025
    Review

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julian E SaleMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom. jes@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105178808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural features that enable replicative DNA polymerases to synthesize DNA rapidly and accurately also limit their ability to copy damaged DNA. Direct replication of DNA damage is termed translesion synthesis (TLS), a mechanism conserved from bacteria to mammals and executed by an array of specialized DNA polymerases. This chapter examines how these translesion polymerases replicate damaged DNA and how they are regulated to balance their ability to replicate DNA lesions with the risk of undesirable mutagenesis. It also discusses how TLS is co-opted to increase the diversity of the immunoglobulin gene hypermutation and the contribution it makes to the mutations that sculpt the genome of cancer cells.

Indexed as

DNA DamageModels, MolecularDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA RepairDNA ReplicationEukaryotaGenes, ImmunoglobulinGenes, NeoplasmModels, BiologicalMutagenesisDNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID23457261
PMCPMC3578355
OpenAlexW2113986107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.