Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23457047›Full record

ReviewProteomics2013

High-throughput cloning and expression library creation for functional proteomics.

Fernanda Festa, Jason Steel, Xiaofang Bian, Joshua Labaer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recombinant β-Carotene Production byFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  6. Characterization of a Pyrethroid-DegradingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Edgotype: a fundamental link between genotype and phenotype.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernanda FestaVirginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6401, USA.
Jason Steel
Xiaofang Bian
Joshua Labaer

Funding

Biomarker Detection Using NAPPA Tumor Antigen ArraysU01CA117374 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ANDERSON, KAREN SUE, LABAER, JOSHUA · 2005 to 2015
$6.2M
High throughput NAPPA-proteoimmunomics and Vibrio cholerae vaccine developmentU01AI077883 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RYAN, EDWARD T. · 2008 to 2012
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA117374NCI NIH HHS U01CA117374NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI077883NIAID NIH HHS U01AI077883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of protein function usually requires the use of a cloned version of the gene for protein expression and functional assays. This strategy is particularly important when the information available regarding function is limited. The functional characterization of the thousands of newly identified proteins revealed by genomics requires faster methods than traditional single-gene experiments, creating the need for fast, flexible, and reliable cloning systems. These collections of ORF clones can be coupled with high-throughput proteomics platforms, such as protein microarrays and cell-based assays, to answer biological questions. In this tutorial, we provide the background for DNA cloning, discuss the major high-throughput cloning systems (Gateway® Technology, Flexi® Vector Systems, and Creator(TM) DNA Cloning System) and compare them side-by-side. We also report an example of high-throughput cloning study and its application in functional proteomics. This tutorial is part of the International Proteomics Tutorial Programme (IPTP12).

Indexed as

Bacteriophage lambdaCell-Free SystemCloning, MolecularDNA Restriction EnzymesEnzymesGene ExpressionGene LibraryHumansOpen Reading FramesPromoter Regions, GeneticProteomicsRecombination, GeneticVibrio choleraeDNA Restriction EnzymesEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID23457047
PMCPMC4369776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.