ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2013
Myocardial infarction: cardioprotection by erythropoietin.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Erythropoietin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: five-year results of the REVIVAL-3 trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2017Trial
- Asialo-rhuEPO as a Potential Neuroprotectant for Ischemic Stroke Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Lack of association between erythropoietin treatment and risk of depression in patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance dialysis: a nationwide database study in Taiwan.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2021Article
- Getting an Early Start in Understanding Perinatal Asphyxia Impact on the Cardiovascular System.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Novel perspectives on the PHD-HIF oxygen sensing pathway in cardioprotection mediated by IPC and RIPC.Frontiers in physiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Extensive research during the last decade demonstrated that a single systemic administration of -erythropoietin (EPO) lead to significant attenuation of myocardial infarction (MI) induced in animals, mostly small rodents, either by a myocardial ischemia followed by reperfusion or by a permanent ligation of a coronary artery. Both methods are critically reviewed with the aim of helping the reader in appreciating key issues in the translation of experimental results to the clinic. Results of several clinical trials in patients with acute MI completed to date failed to demonstrate beneficial effects of EPO, and thus put into question the validity of results obtained in animal models. Comprehensive review of design and results of animal experiments and clinical trials presented here allowed authors to postulate that therapeutic window for EPO during developing MI is very narrow and was possibly missed in negative clinical trials. This point was illustrated by the negative outcome of experiment in the rat model of MI in which timing of EPO administration was similar to that in clinical trials. The design of future clinical trials should allow for a narrow therapeutic window of EPO. Given current standards for onset-to-door and door-to-balloon time the optimal time for EPO administration should be just prior to PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.