Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23456474›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2013

Co-evolution of breast-to-brain metastasis and neural progenitor cells.

Josh Neman, Cecilia Choy, Claudia M Kowolik, Athena Anderson, Vincent J Duenas, Sarah Waliany, Bihong T Chen, Mike Y Chen, Rahul Jandial

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Brain Pre-Metastatic Niche: Biological and Technical Advancements.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Josh NemanDivision of Neurosurgery, City of Hope and Beckman Research Institute, 1500 East Duarte RD, MOB 2001, Duarte-Los Angeles, CA, 91010, USA.
Cecilia Choy
Claudia M Kowolik
Athena Anderson
Vincent J Duenas
Sarah Waliany
Bihong T Chen
Mike Y Chen
Rahul Jandial
City of Hope · USBeckman Research Institute

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA001727 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI MORTIMER, JOANNE E. · 1992 to 2024
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS 2K12CA001727-16A1NCI NIH HHS K12 CA001727NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain colonization by metastatic tumor cells offers a unique opportunity to investigate microenvironmental influences on the neoplastic process. The bi-directional interplay of breast cancer cells (mesodermal origin) and brain cells (neuroectodermal origin) is poorly understood and rarely investigated. In our patients undergoing neurosurgical resection of breast-to-brain metastases, specimens from the tumor/brain interface exhibited increased active gliosis as previously described. In addition, our histological characterization revealed infiltration of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) both outside and inside the tumor margin, leading us to investigate the cellular and molecular interactions between NPCs and metastases. Since signaling by the TGF-β superfamily is involved in both developmental neurobiology and breast cancer pathogenesis, we examined the role of these proteins in the context of brain metastases. The brain-metastatic breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231Br (231Br) expressed BMP-2 at significantly higher levels compared to its matched primary breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 (231). Co-culturing was used to examine bi-directional cellular effects and the relevance of BMP-2 overexpression. When co-cultured with NPCs, 231 (primary) tumor cells failed to proliferate over 15 days. However, 231Br (brain metastatic) tumor cells co-cultured with NPCs escaped growth inhibition after day 5 and proliferated, occurring in parallel with NPC differentiation into astrocytes. Using shRNA and gene knock-in, we then demonstrated BMP-2 secreted by 231Br cells mediated NPC differentiation into astrocytes and concomitant tumor cell proliferation in vitro. In xenografts, overexpression of BMP-2 in primary breast cancer cells significantly enhanced their ability to engraft and colonize the brain, thereby creating a metastatic phenotype. Conversely, BMP-2 knockdown in metastatic breast cancer cells significantly diminished engraftment and colonization. The results suggest metastatic tumor cells create a permissive neural niche by steering NPC differentiation toward astrocytes through paracrine BMP-2 signaling.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansMiceNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Stem CellsSOXB1 Transcription FactorsBMP2 protein, humanBMP4 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4Glial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinglial fibrillary astrocytic protein, mouseNerve Tissue ProteinsSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23456474
PMCPMC3808473
OpenAlexW1968572294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.