Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2013
Impact of StentBoost subtract imaging on patient radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital stent enhancement for coronary stent optimization during PCI: evidence, applications, and future directions.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Seeing the Unseen: Enhanced Stent Visualization Reveals Hidden Coronary Stent Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patient radiation exposure dose reduction using stent-enhanced image processing in percutaneous coronary intervention.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
- Enhanced stent visualization system for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease: effects on contrast media volume and radiation exposure.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, part I: implanting the first stent in the provisional pathway. The 16th expert consensus document of the European Bifurcation Club.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Optical coherence tomography: evaluating the effects of stent boost subtract imaging on stent underexpansion in STEMI patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Observational
- Stent visualization methods to guide percutaneous coronary interventions and assess long-term patency.World journal of cardiology · 2021Review
- Ostial lesion of the anterior descending coronary artery treated via Szabo technique supported by stent boost imaging: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Enhanced stent visualization systems during PCI: A case series and review of literature.Journal of cardiology cases · 2015Article
- Efficacy of non-compliant balloon post-dilation in optimization of contemporary stents: A digital stent enhancement study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels · 2014Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of StentBoost Subtract (SBS) imaging on patient radiation dose during percutaneous coronary intervention. Data were prospectively collected between February 2010 and November 2012 at a tertiary cardiac catheterization. All patients who had scheduled for coronary stent implantation performed by one expert interventional cardiologist with sufficient experience in SBS imaging and radiation protection, were included. The patients were divided into groups with or without SBS. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the impact of SBS imaging on patient radiation dose. Of 712 patients screened, 414 patients were enrolled in the study (with SBS: n = 177, without SBS: n = 237). Although the DAP, fluoroscopy time and cine frames used in the group with SBS were significantly increased when compared with those used in the group without SBS (P < 0.05), multiple linear regression shows SBS imaging has no significant impact on patient radiation dose (P > 0.05). Multivariate predictors of patient radiation dose were the patients' BMI, B2/C lesions, number of stents placed and bifurcation stenting (P < 0.05). In selected patients, SBS imaging can be performed with comparable patient radiation dose, compared with plain fluoroscopic imaging. This may attribute to the operator's sufficient experience in SBS imaging and radiation protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.