ArticleParasitology research2013
The damages of high intensity focused ultrasound to transplanted hydatid cysts in abdominal cavities of rabbits with aids of ultrasound contrast agent and superabsorbent polymer.
Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the effect of gold nanoparticles on hydatid cyst protoscolices under low-power green laser irradiation.Turkish journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Experimental Nanopulse Ablation of Multiple Membrane Parasite on Ex Vivo Hydatid Cyst.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) disrupts the structure and metabolism of human Echinococcus granulosus protoscolex in vitro with a dose effect.Parasitology research · 2017Article
- Non-surgical and non-chemical attempts to treat echinococcosis: do they work?Parasite (Paris, France) · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study investigates the damages of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to transplanted hydatid cysts in abdominal cavities of rabbits with aids of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) and superabsorbent polymer (SAP) alone or in combination. A rabbit model with transplanted hydatid cyst was established by implanting hydatid cyst isolated from infected sheep liver, and HIFU was used to ablate the transplanted cysts with the aid of UCA and SAP alone or in combination. The hydatid cyst with thin wall, good elasticity, approximately spherical, and a diameter of approximately 30 mm was selected for the following experiments. According to our previous studies, a mixture of 0.1 g SAP and 0.5 ml anhydrous ethanol, and the solution of 0.1 ml UCA SonoVue, or both materials were injected into different cyst before HIFU ablation, respectively. The cyst inoculated with the SAP and UCA alone or in combination was immediately implanted into the abdominal cavity of rabbit for HIFU ablation at a dosage of 100 W acoustic powers. The ablation mode was spot scanning at the speed of 3 mm/s. Every target point was scanned three times; every ablating time lasted 3 s. The distance of each ablated layer was 5 mm. The total ablation time depended on the volume of cyst. The comparison of ultrasound image for each layer of hydatid cyst was made before and after HIFU ablation. The protoscolices in ablated cysts were stained by trypan blue exclusion assay, and their structures were observed by light microscopy. To estimate ablation effects of HIFU to the walls of hydatid cysts, the ultrastructure changes of cyst walls were examined by electron microscopy. The pathological changes of rabbits' skins through which ultrasound penetrated were observed to investigate the side effects of HIFU ablation. The results demonstrated that HIFU had some lethal effects to hydatid cysts in vivo, namely, echo enhancements of ultrasound images of cysts, increases in mortality rate of protoscolices from 15.19 % (HIFU alone) to 48.66 % (HIFU + SAP), 38.67 % (HIFU + UCA), and 67.75 % (HIFU + SAP + UCA), respectively, serious structural damages of protoscolices, and destructions or even disappearance of laminated layers and germinal layers in the walls of hydatid cysts ablated by HIFU aided with UCA and SAP alone or in combination. This study demonstrated that destructive effects of HIFU to transplanted hydatid cyst could be enhanced by UCA and SAP alone, but the destruction of HIFU aided with a combination of UCA and SAP to hydatid cysts was more effective than those aided with UCA or SAP alone. The enhanced thermal and cavitation effects of HIFU induced by UCA and SAP might be involved in the enhanced destructive effects of HIFU on hydatid cysts. There were no evidences of pathological changes on rabbits' skins overlying the hydatid cysts after HIFU ablation. The results suggested that the rabbit model with transplanted hydatid cyst may serve as an optional animal model for the experiments of HIFU ablation to hydatid cyst in vivo, and the materials of UCA and SAP were proved as enhancing agents of HIFU ablation to hydatid cysts, and HIFU at a dosage of 100 W acoustic powers was a safe and feasible parameter to ablate the hydatid cysts in this special animal model. These results laid a theoretical foundation for improving HIFU therapy for cystic echinococcosis by inoculation of UCA and SAP into hydatid cysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.