Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23455886›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2014

Impact of the length of time between diagnosis and surgical removal of urologic neoplasms on survival.

Vincent Bourgade, Sarah J Drouin, David R Yates, Jerôme Parra, Marc-Olivier Bitker, Olivier Cussenot, Morgan Rouprêt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Recommendations CCAFU on the management of cancers of the urogenital system during an epidemic with Coronavirus COVID-19].Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent BourgadeAcademic Department of Urology of La Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris VI, 47-83 bvd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Sarah J Drouin
David R Yates
Jerôme Parra
Marc-Olivier Bitker
Olivier Cussenot
Morgan Rouprêt
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRSorbonne Université · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FROnco-Urologie Prédictive

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to assess the effect of surgical wait time on the survival of patients with urological neoplasms, including prostate, bladder, penile, and testicular cancers and upper tract tumours (UTUC). MATERIALS AND

methodsCurrent, relevant studies were identified from the literature. Keywords used for article retrieval were as follows: delay; surgery; prostate cancer; urothelial carcinoma; renal cell carcinoma; testicular cancer; bladder; renal pelvis; ureter; and survival.

resultsRegarding the length of surgical wait time, it does not matter in cases of incidental T1a renal cell carcinomas. In other cases of renal cell carcinomas, surgery should be considered within <1 month; it is of crucial importance in bladder cancer and should be <1 month for a TURBT in cases of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and <1 month for a radical cystectomy in cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer; it is important in invasive UTUC and should be <1 month for a radical nephroureterectomy; it is not crucial in cases of low-risk prostate cancer. In any other case, radical prostatectomy should be considered within <2 months; it is important in testicular cancer and should be fewer than 10 days for an orchiectomy.

conclusionProlonged surgical wait times have an impact on the overall quality of life and anxiety of the patient. Extending the wait time beyond a given threshold can also have a negative impact on the patient's clinical outcomes, but this threshold differs between urological neoplasms.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentCarcinoma, Renal CellCarcinoma, Transitional CellCystectomyHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNephrectomyOrchiectomyPenile NeoplasmsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsTesticular NeoplasmsTime FactorsUreteral Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23455886
OpenAlexW2057424006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.