ReviewEmergency radiology2013
Back to the scanner: expected and unexpected imaging findings following spinal puncture and access.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pachymeningitis With Dural Vessel Dilatation in MOG Antibody-Associated Disease: A Case Report.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2025Article
- Causes of pneumocephalus and when to be concerned about it.Emergency radiology · 2018Review
- Intracranial hypotension as a complication of lumbar puncture prior to elective aneurysm clipping.Surgical neurology international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal canal procedures to withdraw fluid or introduce drugs are common minimally invasive techniques after which patients may experience new symptoms causing presentation to the emergency department. CT or MR imaging as part of the diagnostic workup may reveal expected or unexpected findings which may explain these symptoms. Small foci of gas within the spinal canal or intracranial compartment are common but are usually self-limited. Postlumbar puncture headache, presumed to be due to intracranial hypotension, may manifest on brain MR as dural thickening and low-lying cerebellar tonsils. Treatment with a blood patch is sometimes required for persistent symptoms. Spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage may be a devastating complication of dural puncture and may result in pain and paraplegia. In this review, technical details of these procedures are described and examples of common and uncommon postprocedure appearances on imaging are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.