Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23454862›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, and immunity2013

Characterization of phenotype markers and neuronotoxic potential of polarised primary microglia in vitro.

Vibol Chhor, Tifenn Le Charpentier, Sophie Lebon, Marie-Virgine Oré, Idoia Lara Celador, Julien Josserand, Vincent Degos, Etienne Jacotot, Henrik Hagberg, Karin Sävman and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, and immunity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 367 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
367citing papers in PubMed
31.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

367 citing papers in PubMed, 630 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Targeting neuroinflammation and PVNMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Astrocytic ET-1 System Determines Microglia Phenotype Following Spinal Cord Injury.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

307 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vibol ChhorInserm, U676, Paris, France.
Tifenn Le Charpentier
Sophie Lebon
Marie-Virgine Oré
Idoia Lara Celador
Julien Josserand
Vincent Degos
Etienne Jacotot
Henrik Hagberg
Karin Sävman
Carina Mallard
Pierre Gressens
Bobbi Fleiss
Inserm · FRNeuroNascent (United States) · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT094823MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia mediate multiple facets of neuroinflammation, including cytotoxicity, repair, regeneration, and immunosuppression due to their ability to acquire diverse activation states, or phenotypes. Modulation of microglial phenotype is an appealing neurotherapeutic strategy but a comprehensive study of classical and more novel microglial phenotypic markers in vitro is lacking. The aim of this study was to outline the temporal expression of a battery of phenotype markers from polarised microglia to generate an in vitro tool for screening the immunomodulatory potential of novel compounds. We characterised expression of thirty-one macrophage/microglial phenotype markers in primary microglia over time (4, 12, 36, and 72 h), using RT-qPCR or multiplex protein assay. Firstly, we selected Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as the strongest M1-M2 polarising stimuli, from six stimuli tested. At each time point, markers useful to identify that microglia were M1 included iNOS, Cox-2 and IL-6 and a loss of M2a markers. Markers useful for quantifying M2b-immunomodulatory microglia included, increased IL-1RA and SOCS3 and for M2a-repair and regeneration, included increased arginase-1, and a loss of the M1 and M2b markers were discriminatory. Additional markers were regulated at fewer time points, but are still likely important to monitor when assessing the immunomodulatory potential of novel therapies. Further, to facilitate identification of how novel immunomodulatory treatments alter the functional affects of microglia, we characterised how the soluble products from polarised microglia affected the type and rate of neuronal death; M1/2b induced increasing and M2a-induced decreasing neuronal loss. We also assessed any effects of prior activation state, to provide a way to identify how a novel compound may alter phenotype depending on the stage of injury/insult progression. We identified generally that a prior M1/2b reduced the ability of microglia to switch to M2a. Altogether, we have characterised a profile of phenotype markers and a mechanism of assessing functional outcome that we can use as a reference guide for first-line screening of novel immunomodulatory therapies in vitro in the search for viable neuroprotectants.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell PolarityCell SurvivalCerebral CortexChemokinesCytokinesFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene ExpressionImmunohistochemistryLipopolysaccharidesMaleMiceMicrogliaNeuronsPhenotypeChemokinesCytokinesLipopolysaccharidesRNAToll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID23454862
PMCPMC3694309
OpenAlexW2170959966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.