Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23454721›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2013

Complementary ensemble clustering of biomedical data.

Samah Jamal Fodeh, Cynthia Brandt, Thai Binh Luong, Ali Haddad, Martin Schultz, Terrence Murphy, Michael Krauthammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.European journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  2. The bird's-eye view: A data-driven approach to understanding patient journeys from claims data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A K-Reversible Approach to Model Clinical Trajectories.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samah Jamal FodehYale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. samah.fodeh@yale.edu
Cynthia Brandt
Thai Binh Luong
Ali Haddad
Martin Schultz
Terrence Murphy
Michael Krauthammer

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
Advancing Literature Mining through Image Processing and AnalysisR01LM009956 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUTHAMMER, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2011
$996k
Enhanced Evaluation of Second Stage Translational ResearchR21AG033130 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, TERRENCE EDWARD · 2010 to 2010
$232k
NIA NIH HHS 1R21AG033130-01A2NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30AG21342NIA NIH HHS R21 AG033130NLM NIH HHS 5R01LM009956NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009956NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly growing availability of electronic biomedical data has increased the need for innovative data mining methods. Clustering in particular has been an active area of research in many different application areas, with existing clustering algorithms mostly focusing on one modality or representation of the data. Complementary ensemble clustering (CEC) is a recently introduced framework in which Kmeans is applied to a weighted, linear combination of the coassociation matrices obtained from separate ensemble clustering of different data modalities. The strength of CEC is its extraction of information from multiple aspects of the data when forming the final clusters. This study assesses the utility of CEC in biomedical data, which often have multiple data modalities, e.g., text and images, by applying CEC to two distinct biomedical datasets (PubMed images and radiology reports) that each have two modalities. Referent to five different clustering approaches based on the Kmeans algorithm, CEC exhibited equal or better performance in the metrics of micro-averaged precision and Normalized Mutual Information across both datasets. The reference methods included clustering of single modalities as well as ensemble clustering of separate and merged data modalities. Our experimental results suggest that CEC is equivalent or more efficient than comparable Kmeans based clustering methods using either single or merged data modalities.

Indexed as

Clinical MedicineCluster AnalysisAlgorithmsMultivariate AnalysisRadiology

Identifiers

PMID23454721
PMCPMC4007219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.