Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23452940›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2014

A telephone-supported cardiovascular lifestyle programme (CLIP) for lipid reduction and weight loss in general practice patients: a randomised controlled pilot trial.

Keren Louise Stuart, Belinda Wyld, Kathryn Bastiaans, Nigel Stocks, Grant Brinkworth, Phil Mohr, Manny Noakes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keren Louise Stuart1 Discipline of General Practice, School of Population Health and Clinical Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Belinda Wyld2 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Animal, Food and Health Sciences, PO Box 10041, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Kathryn Bastiaans2 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Animal, Food and Health Sciences, PO Box 10041, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Nigel Stocks1 Discipline of General Practice, School of Population Health and Clinical Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Grant Brinkworth2 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Animal, Food and Health Sciences, PO Box 10041, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Phil Mohr2 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Animal, Food and Health Sciences, PO Box 10041, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Manny Noakes2 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Animal, Food and Health Sciences, PO Box 10041, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Animal, Food and Health Sciences · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate a primary prevention care model using telephone support delivered through an existing health call centre to general practitioner-referred patients at risk of developing CVD, using objective measures of CVD risk reduction and weight loss.

designParticipants were randomised into two groups: (i) those receiving a telephone-supported comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme (CLIP: written structured diet and exercise advice, plus seven telephone sessions with the Heart Foundation Health Information Service); and (ii) those receiving usual care from their general practitioner (control: written general lifestyle advice). Fasting plasma lipids, blood pressure, weight, waist circumference and height were assessed on general practice premises by a practice nurse at Weeks 0 and 12.

settingTwo general practices in Adelaide, South Australia. SUBJECTS: Forty-nine men and women aged 48·0 (sd 5·88) years identified by their general practitioner as being at future risk of CVD (BMI = 33·13 (sd 5·39) kg/m2; LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) = 2·66 (sd 0·92) mmol/l).

resultsCLIP participants demonstrated significantly greater reductions in LDL-C (estimated mean (EM) = 1·98 (se 0·17) mmol/l) and total cholesterol (EM = 3·61 (se 0·21) mmol/l) at Week 12 when compared with the control group (EM = 3·23 (se 0·18) mmol/l and EM = 4·77 (se 0·22) mmol/l, respectively). There were no significant treatment effects for systolic blood pressure (F(1,45) = 0·28, P = 0·60), diastolic blood pressure (F(1,43) = 0·52, P = 0·47), weight (F(1,42) = 3·63, P = 0·063) or waist circumference (F(1,43) = 0·32, P = 0·577).

conclusionsIn general practice patients, delivering CLIP through an existing telephone health service is effective in achieving reductions in LDL-C and total cholesterol. While CLIP may have potential for wider implementation to support primary prevention of CVD, longer-term cost-effectiveness data are warranted.

Indexed as

Social SupportWeight LossAdultBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLCounselingFeeding BehaviorFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansHypertensionLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicCholesterol, LDL

Identifiers

PMID23452940
PMCPMC10282359
OpenAlexW2071235914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.