ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2013
Efficacy of alogliptin in type 2 diabetes treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled studies.
Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors Between Japanese and Non-Japanese Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Methods for Handling Missing Variance Data in Meta-Analyses of Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Benefit-Risk Assessment of Alogliptin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Drug safety · 2019Review
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A comparison of effects of DPP-4 inhibitor and SGLT2 inhibitor on lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes.Lipids in health and disease · 2017Observational
- Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analysis of the ATTAK-J Study.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2016Article
- Review
- Emerging options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Chinese patients: focus on arterial function and alogliptin.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Review
- Alogliptin benzoate for management of type 2 diabetes.Vascular health and risk management · 2015Review
- Clinical utility of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a descriptive summary of current efficacy trials.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors: a perspective review.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2014Review
- Article
- Tight glycemic control and cardiovascular effects in type 2 diabetic patients.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlogliptin is a new dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-4) inhibitor, which is under investigation for treatment of type 2 diabetes either alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
methodsComputer based search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) databases. Meta-analysis was carried out by incorporating double-blind randomized controlled studies done on the efficacy of alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes. The efficacy and tolerability of alogliptin was determined by standardized mean differences (SMDs) and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio. Heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-squared test (Cochran Q test) and I2 statistics.
resultsThe pooled SMDs demonstrated a significant reduction in HbA1c in patients treated with alogliptin 12.5 mg (SMD = -0.81; 95% CI, -1.11 to -0.51) or alogliptin 25 mg (SMD= -0.98; 95%CI= -1.30 to -0.66) as compared with controls. The SMD for reduction in fasting plasma glucose level (FPG) from baseline was also statistically significant among alogliptin treated patients. However, the effect of alogliptin on body weight change was inconclusive. The proportion of patients who discontinued alogliptin due to adverse events was not different from controls. Similarly, the meta-analyses of specific adverse events did not demonstrate statistically significant differences.
conclusionsAlogliptin alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drug has shown a significant reduction in HbA1c and FPG level in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, its consistent efficacy for longer duration of therapy needs further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.